Skip to content

TREK™ 1012272-08Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · TREK™ Coronary Dilatation Catheter 2.50 mm x 8 mm / Rapid-Exchange · Class 2

All models of TREK (50)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648138270), received between Jun 15, 2020 and Mar 20, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture2
  • Material Separation2
  • Device Markings/Labelling Problem1
  • Difficult to Advance1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 20, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT THE PROXIMAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (PLAD) ARTERY WITH HEAVY CALCIFICATION. THE 2.5X8MM TREK RX BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION AND THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED; HOWEVER, DURING THE FIRST INFLATION AT 2 ATMOSPHERES (ATM) THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED WITH A 2.5X12MM TREK RX BDC. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21656413 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 16, 2024Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem

    SUBSEQUENT TO THE INITIALLY FILED REPORT IT WAS STATED THE YELLOW SCANNER IS BEING USED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19753930 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 20, 2023Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance; Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A LESION IN THE MID LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY (MLAD) WITH HEAVY CALCIFICATION, MILD TORTUOSITY AND 90% STENOSIS. THE 2.50X8MM TREK BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS BEING ADVANCED WHEN RESISTANCE WAS MET WITH THE LESION; HOWEVER, WAS INFLATED ONCE FOR 5 SECONDS WHEN A RUPTURE OCCURRED AT 10 ATMOSPHERES. ANOTHER UNSPECIFIED DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE AND AN UNSPECIFIED STENT WAS IMPLANTED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17783291 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 28, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS A LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION (LHC) VIA A RADIAL APPROACH. THE 2.50X8MM TREK BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS BEING ADVANCED OVER THE GUIDE WIRE WHEN THE SHAFT WAS NOTED SEPARATED IN TWO PIECES; THEREFORE, THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED. ANOTHER NC TREK WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17221101 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 15, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation

    SUS VOLUNTARY EVENT REPORT ((B)(4)) RECEIVED WHICH STATES: WHILE TRYING TO REINSERT 2.5 X 8 TREK PTCA BALLOON, THE SHAFT BROKE AND MADE THE DEVICE UNUSABLE. BALLOON WAS NOT IN PATIENT AT THAT TIME BUT ON THE WIRE ONLY. FDA SAFETY REPORT ID# (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 10156105 ↗

Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices

All Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page