TREK™ 1012272-08Recalls & reported problems
Abbott Vascular Inc. · TREK™ Coronary Dilatation Catheter 2.50 mm x 8 mm / Rapid-Exchange · Class 2
All models of TREK (50)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648138270), received between Jun 15, 2020 and Mar 20, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Rupture2
- Material Separation2
- Device Markings/Labelling Problem1
- Difficult to Advance1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 20, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT THE PROXIMAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (PLAD) ARTERY WITH HEAVY CALCIFICATION. THE 2.5X8MM TREK RX BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION AND THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED; HOWEVER, DURING THE FIRST INFLATION AT 2 ATMOSPHERES (ATM) THE BALLOON RUPTURED. THE PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED WITH A 2.5X12MM TREK RX BDC. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21656413 ↗MalfunctionJul 16, 2024Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem
SUBSEQUENT TO THE INITIALLY FILED REPORT IT WAS STATED THE YELLOW SCANNER IS BEING USED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19753930 ↗MalfunctionSep 20, 2023Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance; Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A LESION IN THE MID LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY (MLAD) WITH HEAVY CALCIFICATION, MILD TORTUOSITY AND 90% STENOSIS. THE 2.50X8MM TREK BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS BEING ADVANCED WHEN RESISTANCE WAS MET WITH THE LESION; HOWEVER, WAS INFLATED ONCE FOR 5 SECONDS WHEN A RUPTURE OCCURRED AT 10 ATMOSPHERES. ANOTHER UNSPECIFIED DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE AND AN UNSPECIFIED STENT WAS IMPLANTED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17783291 ↗MalfunctionJun 28, 2023Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS A LEFT HEART CATHETERIZATION (LHC) VIA A RADIAL APPROACH. THE 2.50X8MM TREK BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS BEING ADVANCED OVER THE GUIDE WIRE WHEN THE SHAFT WAS NOTED SEPARATED IN TWO PIECES; THEREFORE, THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED. ANOTHER NC TREK WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17221101 ↗MalfunctionJun 15, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation
SUS VOLUNTARY EVENT REPORT ((B)(4)) RECEIVED WHICH STATES: WHILE TRYING TO REINSERT 2.5 X 8 TREK PTCA BALLOON, THE SHAFT BROKE AND MADE THE DEVICE UNUSABLE. BALLOON WAS NOT IN PATIENT AT THAT TIME BUT ON THE WIRE ONLY. FDA SAFETY REPORT ID# (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10156105 ↗
Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous223 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892815200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 death203 reports
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous162 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892820200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous161 reports
- NC TREK 1012454-08Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 recalls59 reports
- TREK™ 1012272-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 deaths158 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall84 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall1 death83 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page