Skip to content

TREK™ 1012278-08Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · TREK™ Coronary Dilatation Catheter 4.0 mm x 8 mm / Rapid-Exchange · Class 2

All models of TREK (50)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648138690), received between Sep 29, 2021 and Nov 22, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Advance” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Leak/Splash1
  • Material Rupture1
  • Material Split, Cut or Torn1

Patient problems

  • Air Embolism1
  • Cardiac Arrest1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 22, 2024Leak/Splash; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Leak/Splash; Material Split, Cut or Torn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A LESION IN THE LEFT MAIN LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY. AFTER STENT DEPLOYMENT, THE 4X8MM TREK BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION FOR POST DILATATION; HOWEVER, THE BALLOON FAILED TO INFLATE. THEREFORE, THE BDC WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND AIR WAS NOTED TO BE IN THE INFLATION DEVICE THAT WAS ATTACHED TO THE BDC. THE INFLATION DEVICE WAS DISCONNECTED FROM THE BDC TO REMOVE THE AIR FROM THE INFLATION DEVICE AND THE BDC WAS ADVANCE AND ATTEMPTED TO BE INFLATED A SECOND TIME WHEN CONTRAST WAS NOTED TO SHOOT DOWN THE VESSEL AND THE BALLOON WAS THOUGHT TO HAVE BURST. THE BDC WAS REMOVED AND WAS NOTED TO BE INTACT. THE PATIENT BECAME UNSTABLE AND ARRESTED; THEREFORE, CPR WAS PERFORMED, AND THE PATIENT WAS ABLE TO BE REVIVED. HOWEVER, THE PATIENT HAD BROKEN RIBS, BUT NORMAL LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION. THE PATIENT WAS MONITORED FOR A FEW DAYS PRIOR TO BEING DISCHARGED. POST PROCEDURE, THE BALLOON WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE INFLATED OUTSIDE THE PATIENT ANATOMY AND SALINE WAS NOTED TO BE LEAKING FROM A HOLE IN THE SHAFT OF THE BDC. THE ACCOUNT REPORTED THAT IT WAS CONCLUDED THAT THE RESPONSE FROM THE PATIENT

    Patient problems: Air Embolism; Cardiac Arrest

    MAUDE report 20760618 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 29, 2021Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance; Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA) INTERVENTION A NON-ABBOTT DEVICE FRACTURED IN THE VESSEL AND THE CATHETER TIP COULD NOT BE SNARED. A TREK 4.0X8MM BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER WAS ADVANCED, BUT HAD SOME DIFFICULTY PASSING THE RETAINED CATHETER TIP IN THE RCA. ONCE AT THE DESIRED LOCATION, THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED TO 16 ATMOSPHERES AND THEN TO 14 ATMOSPHERES FOR 12 SECONDS IN THE MID RCA AT THE SITE OF THE BROKEN CATHETER TIP BEFORE THE BALLOON BURST. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITHOUT ISSUE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. ANOTHER BALLOON WAS USED TO CONTINUE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THIS ISSUE WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12550615 ↗

Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices

All Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page