Skip to content

TREK 1012405-08Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter 2.50 mm x 8 mm / Over-The-Wire · Class 2

All models of TREK (50)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648153969), received between Apr 6, 2022 and Oct 16, 2023 — classified as 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Remove3
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method2
  • Deflation Problem1
  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Material Rupture1
  • Off-Label Use1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 16, 2023Deflation Problem; Off-Label Use; Difficult to Remove; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Deflation Problem; Off-Label Use; Difficult to Remove; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS AN ETHANOL EFFUSION OF THE VEIN OF MARSHALL. THE 2.5X8MM TREK BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS USED IN A PROCEDURE WITH CONTRAST MIX OF 5ML IODIN AND 15ML SALINE. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED ONE TIME TO 3 ATMOSPHERES, BUT THERE WAS DIFFICULTY DEFLATING IT. NEGATIVE PRESSURE WAS HELD FOR 5-10 SECONDS; HOWEVER, THE BALLOON ONLY PARTIALLY DEFLATED. THE BDC WAS REMOVED WITH THE BALLOON PARTIALLY INFLATED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY REPORTED IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17946482 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 16, 2022Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A HEAVILY CALCIFIED, HEAVILY TORTUOUS LESION IN THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). THE 2.5X8 MM TREK BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS ADVANCED WITH RESISTANCE WITH THE ANATOMY AND RUPTURED AT 16 ATMOSPHERES (ATM) DURING THE FIRST INFLATION. THERE WAS RESISTANCE NOTED WITH A GUIDING CATHETER DURING REMOVAL. ANOTHER BDC WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15234715 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 6, 2022Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PREPARATION OF A 2.5X8MM TREK RX BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) THE SUPPORT STYLET WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. THE BDC WAS REPLACED WITH AN UNSPECIFIED DEVICE TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14022453 ↗

Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices

All Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page