Skip to content

TREK 1012409-15Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · TREK Coronary Dilatation Catheter 3.50 mm x 15 mm / Over-The-Wire · Class 2

All models of TREK (50)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 08717648154263), received between Aug 26, 2022 and Aug 26, 2022 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Advance” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Advance1
  • Difficult to Remove1
  • Material Rupture1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 26, 2022Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO USE ON BOTH BALLOONS THERE WAS NO DIFFICULTY REMOVING THE PROTECTIVE SHEATH, THE CATHETERS WERE SOAKED IN SALINE AND BOTH BDCS WERE PREPPED (AIR ASPIRATION) OUTSIDE THE ANATOMY. THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A RESTENOSED LESION IN THE RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). THE 3.50X15MM TREK BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER WAS ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION WITH DIFFICULTY DUE TO THE ANATOMY AND THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED TWO TIMES TO 14 ATMOSPHERES (ATM); HOWEVER, THE BALLOON RUPTURED AT 14 ATM. THE BDC WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITH DIFFICULTY DUE TO THE ANATOMY. THEN, A 4.00X15MM TREK BDC WAS ADVANCE WITH DIFFICULTY DUE TO THE ANATOMY AND THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED ALSO TO 14 ATM TWICE; HOWEVER, THE SECOND BALLOON ALSO RUPTURED AT 14 ATM. THE BDC WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT WITH RESISTANCE NOTED DUE TO THE ANATOMY. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY REPORTED IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15306622 ↗

Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices

All Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page