Armada B2050-020Recalls & reported problems
Abbott Vascular Inc. · Armada 35 PTA Catheter 5 mm x 20 mm x 135 cm / Over-The-Wire · Class 2
All models of Armada (213)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648155161), received between Dec 4, 2019 and Jun 26, 2020 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination /Decontamination Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
- Deflation Problem1
- Material Rupture1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 26, 2020Material Rupture; Material Rupture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT THE CALCIFIED POPLITEAL ARTERY WITH 80% STENOSIS. THE ARMADA 35 PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOGPLASTY (PTA) CATHETER RUPTURED AT 6 ATMOSPHERES. A NEW BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10202350 ↗MalfunctionFeb 19, 2020Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THREE ARMADA 35 PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY (PTA) CATHETERS (5X200MM, 5X20MM, 6X200MM) AND TWO ABSOLUTE PRO SELF-EXPANDING STENT SYSTEMS (SESS) (6X150MM, 6X60MM) WERE RECEIVED BY THE CUSTOMER WITH BLOOD MARKS ON THE OUTSIDE PACKAGING. THE DEVICES WERE NOT USED AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9727319 ↗MalfunctionDec 4, 2019Deflation Problem; Deflation Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS WAS A PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTION TREATING THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY, MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION. THE ARMADA DILATATION CATHETER ADVANCED TO THE LESION AND BALLOON INFLATION WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT REPORTED ISSUES. FOLLOWING, THE BALLOON FAILED TO DEFLATE. TWO DIFFERENT SYRINGES (10CC AND 3CC) WERE USED TO MANUALLY DEFLATE THE BALLOON. THE BALLOON EVENTUALLY DEFLATED, EXTREMELY SLOWLY (APPROXIMATELY 10 MINUTES). THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITHOUT FURTHER ISSUES. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT AND THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED REGARDING THIS ISSUE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9413128 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page