Skip to content

Armada A1020-120Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · Armada 14 PTA Catheter 2.0 mm x 120 mm x 90 cm / Over-The-Wire · Class 2

All models of Armada (213)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648155703), received between Jan 10, 2017 and Jun 12, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Material Rupture1
  • Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 12, 2025Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging

    IT WAS REPORTED DURING THE PROCEDURAL PREPARATION OF A 2.0X120MM ARMADA 18 BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) THAT THE INNER PACKAGING OF THE DEVICE WAS NOTED TO HAVE A HOLE WHEN REMOVED FROM ITS PACKAGE. THEREFORE, ANOTHER BDC WAS USED TO CONTINUE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT NOR CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN PROCEDURE REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22197256 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 10, 2017Material Rupture; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUDED DE NOVO LESION WITH HEAVY CALCIFICATION IN THE MID ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY. THE 2.0X120MM ARMADA 14 BALLOON CATHETER WAS NOT PREPPED OUTSIDE THE ANATOMY PRIOR TO USE. THE CATHETER WAS ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION WITHOUT RESISTANCE; HOWEVER, LOSS OF GAUGE PRESSURE WAS NOTED. THE BALLOON HAD RUPTURED AT 10 ATMOSPHERE (ATM) DURING THE 1ST INFLATION. A NEW 2.0X120MM ARMADA 14 BALLOON CATHETER WAS USED IN THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6238874 ↗

Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices

All CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page