XIENCE XPEDITION 1074350-33Recalls & reported problems
Abbott Vascular Inc. · XIENCE Xpedition LL Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System 3.50 mm x 33 mm / Rapid-Exchange · Class 3 · Implant
All models of XIENCE XPEDITION (41)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648162572), received between Jul 13, 2017 and Oct 19, 2017 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment Of Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment Of Device Component1
- Difficult To Position1
- Difficult to Remove1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- No Patient Involvement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 19, 2017Detachment Of Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING PREPARATION OF A 3.50 X 33 MM XIENCE XPEDITION RX STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS), THE SDS WAS REMOVED FROM THE DISPENSER COIL LOOP AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THE HUB BROKE OFF THE SHAFT. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 6963603 ↗MalfunctionJul 13, 2017Difficult To Position; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED, 90% STENOSED, 30MM-LONG LESION IN THE MODERATELY TORTUOUS PROXIMAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) CORONARY ARTERY. AFTER CROSSING THE LESION WITH A 014 HI-TORQUE (HT) VERSATURN F 190 HC GUIDE WIRE, A 2.5MM NON-ABBOTT BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER WAS ADVANCED OVER THE VERSATURN AND PRE-DILATATION WAS PERFORMED. A 3.5X33MM RX XIENCE XPEDITION STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS) WAS THEN ADVANCED OVER THE VERSATURN, BUT, PRIOR TO EXITING THE GUIDING CATHETER, RESISTANCE WAS MET BETWEEN THE XIENCE XPEDITION AND THE VERSATURN. WHEN ATTEMPTING TO RETRACT THE XPEDITION OVER THE VERSATURN, RESISTANCE WAS ALSO FELT BETWEEN THESE TWO DEVICES. THUS, BOTH DEVICES WERE REMOVED AS A SINGLE UNIT. A NON-ABBOTT GUIDE WIRE WAS ADVANCED, FOLLOWED BY ADVANCEMENT AND DEPLOYMENT OF A 3.5X33MM NON-ABBOTT STENT. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO OCCURRENCE OF A CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6712728 ↗
Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices
- SYNERGY™ H7493926038300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent8 deaths124 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent7 deaths106 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926020300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent9 deaths90 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016250Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths82 reports
- XIENCE Sierra™ 1550350-33Abbott Vascular Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent1 recall32 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30022UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths76 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926024300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths75 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30015UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths73 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page