Skip to content

Absolute Pro 1012528-60Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · Absolute Pro Vascular Self-Expanding Stent System 6.0 mm x 60 mm x 80 cm / Over-The-Wire · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Absolute Pro (51)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648175558), received between Oct 7, 2017 and Jun 4, 2018 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult To Position” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult To Position1
  • Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
  • Premature Activation1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 4, 2018Difficult To Position; Premature Activation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS WAS A PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTION TREATING THE ILIAC ARTERY, MODERATELY CALCIFIED LESION. A 7 FRENCH TERUMO CATHETER WAS PLACED. FOLLOWING, AN ABSOLUTE PRO STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS) WAS ADVANCED WITHIN THE CATHETER, HOWEVER, RESISTANCE WAS MET WITHIN THIS CATHETER. THE ABSOLUTE PRO SDS WAS REMOVED FROM THE CATHETER WITHOUT RESISTANCE. ONCE OUTSIDE THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY, THE STENT WAS NOTED TO BE PARTIALLY DEPLOYED. ANOTHER ABSOLUTE PRO WAS USED IN REPLACEMENT WITHOUT ISSUE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED REGARDING THIS ISSUE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7567600 ↗
  • InjuryOct 7, 2017Difficult or Delayed Positioning

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A LESION IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) AND THE ILIAC VESSEL, BOTH WITH MODERATE CALCIFICATION. THE 7X150MM ARMADA 35 BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS ADVANCED TO THE SFA LESION WITHOUT ISSUE, BUT RUPTURED AT 5 ATMOSPHERES. THE BDC WAS REMOVED WITHOUT ISSUE AND REPLACED WITH A NEW ARMADA 35 BDC. THE 6.0X60MM ABSOLUTE PRO VASCULAR STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS) WAS ADVANCED TO THE ILIAC LESION. MID-DEPLOYMENT, THE THUMBWHEEL JAMMED. THE HANDLE WAS CRACKED OPEN, AND THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED MANUALLY. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6927307 ↗

Other STENT, ILIAC devices

All STENT, ILIAC devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page