Skip to content

Graftmaster 1012584-16Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · GRAFTMASTER Coronary Stent Graft System 4.80 mm x 16 mm / Rapid-Exchange · Class f · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648176500), received between Oct 17, 2017 and Mar 5, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient-Device Incompatibility” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient-Device Incompatibility3
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
  • Failure to Advance1
  • Material Separation1
  • Off-Label Use1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • Cardiac Arrest1
  • Cardiogenic Shock1
  • Embolism/Embolus1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Perforation1
  • Pericardial Effusion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 5, 2026Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Material Separation; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A PERFORATION IN THE OSTIAL PROXIMAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) AND DISTAL LEFT MAIN TRUNK (LMT) ARTERIES. THE 4.8X16M GRAFTMASTER COVERED STENT WAS ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION AND THE STENT WAS IMPLANTED; HOWEVER, POST DEPLOYMENT THE SHAFT SEPARATED DURING REMOVAL IN THE AORTA. THE SEPARATED BALLOON WAS SNARED FROM THE PATIENT, WHICH CAUSED A CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN TREATING A NOTED RESIDUAL LEAK WHERE THE STENT WAS IMPLANTED. THE PATIENT WENT INTO SHOCK, RESPIRATORY FAILURE AND PERICARDIAL EFFUSION WAS NOTED WHICH REQUIRED PERICARDIOCENTESIS AND AN IMPELLA DEVICE. ANOTHER GRAFTMASTER STENT WAS USED TO CONTINUE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Cardiogenic Shock; Foreign Body In Patient; Pericardial Effusion; Respiratory Failure

    MAUDE report 24524525 ↗
  • InjuryMar 4, 2026Patient-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A LESION IN THE PROXIMAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY. A PERFORATION OCCURRED THEREFORE TWO 4.0X16MM GRAFTMASTER COVERED STENTS WERE IMPLANTED TO SEAL THE PERFORATION. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24506714 ↗
  • InjuryJun 4, 2021Patient-Device Incompatibility; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT PRESENTED IN DECLINING HEALTH. DURING A CORONARY INTERVENTION, A LARGE PERFORATION OCCURRED IN THE SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT (SVG). A 4.8X16MM RX GRAFTMASTER COVERED STENT WAS ADVANCED TO THE PERFORATION AND DEPLOYED AT 15 ATMOSPHERES (ATM) BUT WAS DEPLOYED TOO PROXIMAL IN THE PERFORATION AND DID NOT SEAL THE PERFORATION. A 4.0X16MM RX GRAFTMASTER, WAS THEN ADVANCED AND DEPLOYED AT 15 ATM BUT THE PERFORATION FAILED TO SEAL. AT SOME POINT POST PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WENT INTO CARDIAC ARREST AND DIED. IN THE OPINION OF THE PHYSICIAN, THE USE OF THE GRAFTMASTER STENTS DID NOT CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTE TO THE PATIENT DEATH IN ANY WAY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest; Perforation

    MAUDE report 11939766 ↗
  • InjuryApr 26, 2021Off-Label Use; Patient-Device Incompatibility; Off-Label Use; Patient-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT AN ANEURYSM IN THE DISTAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). FOUR NON-ABBOTT ENDOVASCULAR COILS WERE IMPLANTED IN THE ANEURYSM. A NON-ABBOTT COVERED STENT WAS ADVANCED; HOWEVER, IT WAS UNABLE TO CROSS TO THE TARGET SITE AND WAS REMOVED. TWO OVERLAPPING GRAFTMASTER STENTS WERE IMPLANTED TO EXCLUDE THE ANEURYSM AND PROMOTE FLOW INTO THE RIGHT POSTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY (PDA). ANGIOGRAPHY NOTED MINIMAL FLOW INTO THE ANEURYSM. POST DILATATION WAS PERFORMED TO SEAL THE RESIDUAL FLOW; HOWEVER, ONE GRAFTMASTER STENT EMBOLIZED INTO THE ANEURYSM. THERE WERE NO ATTEMPTS MADE TO REMOVE THE EMBOLIZED GRAFTMASTER; HOWEVER, AN ADDITIONAL COIL WAS PLACED MID VESSEL TO OCCLUDE FLOW INTO THE CORONARY ANEURYSM. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Embolism/Embolus; Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 11728557 ↗
  • InjuryOct 17, 2017Failure to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 4.8 X 16 MM GRAFTMASTER STENT WAS USED TO SEAL A PERFORATION CAUSED BY ANOTHER DEVICE. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO CROSS THE LESION HOWEVER, IT DID NOT CROSS THE ANATOMY. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED WITH A 4 X 16 MM GRAFTMASTER STENT WHICH CROSSED SUCCESSFULLY. A SECOND GRAFTMASTER 2.8 X 16 MM DEVICE WAS ALSO USED IN THE PROCEDURE WITH NO COMPLICATIONS OR ADVERSE EVENTS, AND THE PERFORATION WAS SUCCESSFULLY SEALED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CAN BE PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 6956801 ↗

Other coronary covered stent devices

All coronary covered stent devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page