Omnilink Elite 1012632-39Recalls & reported problems
Abbott Vascular Inc. · Omnilink Elite Vascular Balloon-Expandable Stent System 9.0 mm x 39 mm x 135 cm Over-The-Wire · Class 3 · Implant
All models of Omnilink Elite (42)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648178559), received between Sep 6, 2018 and Nov 6, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated5
- Failure to Advance2
- Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- No Patient Involvement2
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 6, 2024Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE TO TREAT A DE NOVO LESION IN THE SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY WITH HEAVY CALCIFICATION AND HEAVY TORTUOSITY. THE 9X39MM OMNI LINK ELITE BALLOON EXPANDING STENT (BES) WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION; HOWEVER, THE BES FAILED TO CROSS DUE TO THE ANATOMY. THE STENT BECAME DISLODGED; THEREFORE, THE BES WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY REPORTED IN THE PROCEDURE. ANOTHER SAME SIZE STENT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20623122 ↗InjuryApr 1, 2022Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A LESION IN THE RIGHT COMMON ILIAC ARTERY. DURING ADVANCING OF THE FIRST OMNILINK STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS) (1012632-39, 1050441), THE STENT DISLODGED, AND A SNARE DEVICE WAS USED TO RETRIEVE THE DISLODGED STENT SUCCESSFULLY. A SECOND OMNILINK SDS (1012632-29, 1030941) WAS ADVANCED INTO THE VESSEL AND THE STENT DISLODGED AS WELL. THE DISLODGED STENT WAS ABLE TO BE RETRIEVED WITH THE DELIVERY SYSTEM BUT A CUT DOWN OF THE VESSEL WAS PERFORMED TO REMOVE THE SECOND DISLODGED STENT. THERE WAS SOME RESISTANCE NOTED DURING ADVANCEMENT DUE TO A SHARP ANGLE IN THE VESSEL. A THIRD OMNILINK SDS WAS USED SUCCESSFULLY TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13978441 ↗MalfunctionMar 2, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE PACKAGE WAS OPENED, THE STENT WAS ALREADY DISLODGED FROM THE BALLOON IN THE PACKAGING. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13653490 ↗MalfunctionOct 2, 2020Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Misassembled During Manufacturing /Shipping; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT OUT OF PACKAGING, THE 9.0X39MM OMNILINK STENT AND PROTECTIVE SHEATH WERE OFF OF THE DELIVERY CATHETER AND ON THE BOTTOM OF THE POUCH. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. A NEW 8.0X59MM OMNILINK STENT WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 10623414 ↗MalfunctionSep 6, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 9.0 X 39 MM OMNILINK ELITE STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM PACKAGE WAS OPENED AND IT WAS NOTED THAT THE STENT WAS NOT ON THE DELIVERY SYSTEM BALLOON. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. A SECOND OMNILINK ELITE STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM WAS USED WITHOUT ISSUE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 7853327 ↗
Other STENT, ILIAC devices
- Cordis S.M.A.R.T. Control Vascular Stent System C10040MLCordis US Corp. · STENT, ILIAC1 recall3 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012534-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC51 reports
- Cordis S.M.A.R.T. Control Vascular Stent System C09060MLCordis US Corp. · STENT, ILIAC1 recall0 reports
- Protégé™ GPS™ SERB65-09-60-80Ev3, Inc · STENT, ILIAC1 recall0 reports
- Absolute Pro 1012535-100Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC1 death41 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012631-39Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC27 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012632-29Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC25 reports
- Omnilink Elite 1012631-59Abbott Vascular Inc. · STENT, ILIAC21 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page