Skip to content

NC TREK NEO™ 1400325-15Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · NC TREK NEO™ Coronary Dilatation Catheter 3.25 mm x 15 mm / Rapid-Exchange · Class 2

All models of NC TREK NEO (45)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648232589), received between Nov 22, 2022 and Jan 29, 2026 — classified as 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Advance” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 1 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 1 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Advance4
  • Difficult to Remove2
  • Material Rupture2
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 29, 2026Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THIS WAS A PROCEDURE TO TREAT A HEAVILY CALCIFIED, MILDLY TORTUOUS, AND 90% STENOSED DISTAL LEFT CIRCUMFLEX ARTERY. AN NC TREK 3.25X15MM WAS INSERTED AND ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION. HOWEVER, DURING THE FIRST INFLATION, THE BALLOON RUPTURED AT 12ATM. THEREFORE, THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24216488 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 15, 2025Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance; Material Rupture; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO TREAT A MODERATELY CALCIFIED AND MILDLY TORTUOUS LESION IN THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY (LAD). A 3.25X15MM NC TREK NEO BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS PREPARED WITH NO NOTED ISSUES AND ADVANCED TO THE LESION THROUGH RESISTANCE WITH THE ANATOMY. HOWEVER, DURING THE SECOND INFLATION THE BALLOON WAS NOTED TO RUPTURE AT 8ATMS. THEREFORE, THE BDC WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW NC TREK BDC AND THE PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS NOR CLINICAL DELAY. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23058679 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2023Device Damaged by Another Device; Difficult to Advance; Device Damaged by Another Device; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A SHORT LESION IN THE PROXIMAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (PLAD) ARTERY. THE VERSATURN GUIDE WIRE WAS ADVANCED. PRE-DILATATION WAS PERFORMED USING A 2.5X12 TREK RX BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) FOLLOWED WITH THE FIRST OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY (OCT) RUN IN THE LAD. THE 3.25X28MMMM XIENCE SKYPOINT STENT WAS THEN IMPLANTED. THE 3.25X15MM NC TREK NEO BDC WAS USED FOR POST DILATATION, HOWEVER, THERE WAS RESISTANCE FELT AT THE PROXIMAL EDGE OF THE XIENCE SKYPOINT STENT, DUE TO THE BDC NOT BEING ABLE TO BEND THE CURVE OF THE VESSEL AND AFTER PUSHING SLIGHTLY WAS ABLE TO ADVANCE TO THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE STENT AND DILATATION WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT ISSUES. ANOTHER OCT RUN WAS PERFORMED TO CHECK THE PLACEMENT OF THE STENT AND UPON EVALUATION OF THE OCT IMAGE, IT WAS NOTED THAT THERE WAS SIGNIFICANT MALAPPOSITION OF THE STENT AND AN ABSENCE OF STENT STRUTS ON THE OPPOSING WALL WHICH WAS CONFIRMED IN THE LONGITUDINAL MODE DISPLAY DEMONSTRATING THAT 2 OF THE PROXIMAL STENT STRUTS WERE PROLAPSED ON ONE ANOTHER. THE OPPOSING WALL OF THE STENT HAD LIFTED FROM THE WALL CAUSING A >300 MICRON MALAPPOSITION. THE PHYSICIAN THEN DECIDED TO INFLATE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18319327 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 6, 2023Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A 75% STENOSED LESION IN THE LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY (LM OR LMCA) TO THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY. A 3.25X15MM NC TREK NEO BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS ADVANCED; HOWEVER, IT MET HEAVY RESISTANCE INSIDE OF THE GUIDE CATHETER (GC) AND COULD NOT BE FULLY ADVANCED OUT OF THE GC. THE BDC WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE FROM THE GUIDE CATHETER BUT WAS ULTIMATELY REMOVED, AND ANOTHER NC TREK NEO WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16114196 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 22, 2022Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A 75% STENOSED DE NOVO LESION IN THE LEFT MAIN ARTERY TO THE LEFT ANTERIOR ARTERY. POST STENT IMPLANTATION, A 3.50X15MM NC TREK NEO BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) AND A 3.25X15MM NC TREK NEO BDC WERE ATTEMPTED TO BE ADVANCED TO THE TARGET LESION FOR POST DILATION USING THE KISSING BALLOON TECHNIQUE. HOWEVER, THE BALLOON DILATATION CATHETERS MET WITH DIFFICULTY WHEN ADVANCING INSIDE THE GUIDE CATHETER. THEREFORE, THE BDCS WERE REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND DIFFICULTY WAS ALSO NOTED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY REPORTED IN THE PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED WITH 2 NON-ABBOTT BALLOONS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15849462 ↗

Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices

All Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page