NC TREK NEO™ 1400350-20Recalls & reported problems
Abbott Vascular Inc. · NC TREK NEO™ Coronary Dilatation Catheter 3.50 mm x 20 mm / Rapid-Exchange · Class 2
All models of NC TREK NEO (45)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648232640), received between Mar 10, 2023 and Nov 24, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Remove5
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method4
- Deflation Problem2
- Material Separation2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Break1
- Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
- Difficult to Advance1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
- Perforation of Vessels1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 24, 2025Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE 3.50X20MM NC TREK NEO RX BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER WAS REMOVED FROM ITS DISPENSER COIL, THE PROXIMAL SHAFT WAS SEPARATED INTO TWO PIECES CLOSE TO THE HUB. THERE WAS NO DEVICE USE OR PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23633622 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2025Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT LESIONS IN THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) AND LEFT MAIN (LM) ARTERIES. AFTER ROTABLATION, THE 3.5X20MM NC TREK NEO BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS ADVANCED ON A HI-TORQUE BMW UNIVERSAL 190CM GUIDE WIRE (GW). THE BDC WAS USED IN THE PROCEDURE; HOWEVER, WHEN ATTEMPTING TO DEFLATE THE BALLOON FOR 2-3 SECONDS, THE BALLOON WOULD NOT FULLY DEFLATE. AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO REMOVE THE BDC FROM THE GW; HOWEVER, THE DEVICE COULD NOT BE REMOVED FROM EACH OTHER AND RESISTANCE WAS NOTED BETWEEN THE DEVICES. AFTER, SEVERAL ATTEMPTS THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO REMOVED THE PARTIALLY DEFLATED BALLOON WITH THE GW AND 7 FR GUIDE CATHETER (GC) AS AS A SINGLE UNIT. THE PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED WITH ANOTHER NC TREK NEO BDC. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY REPORTED IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22910170 ↗MalfunctionAug 7, 2025Break; Product Quality Problem; Break; Product Quality Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE 3.5X20 MM NC TREK NEO BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS NOTED TO BE DAMAGED UPON UNPACKAGING OF THE DEVICE. THERE WAS NO REPORTED DEVICE USE OR PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS IDENTIFIED THAT THERE WAS A BREAK IN THE HYPOTUBE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22739216 ↗InjuryApr 1, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THE PROCEDURE WAS TO PERFORM INTERVENTION OF A SAPHENOUS VEIN GRAFT (SVG) TO RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). A PERFORATION OCCURRED DURING USE OF A 3.50X20MM NC TREK NEO BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER. WHICH WAS TREATED WITH BALLOON TAMPONADE AND DEPLOYMENT OF A 3.50X19MM GRAFTMASTER, SEALING THE PERFORATION. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Perforation of Vessels
MAUDE report 21738031 ↗MalfunctionJan 8, 2025Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Remove; Material Rupture; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT AN UNSPECIFIED IN-STENT RESTENOSIS IN THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY. THE 3.5X20MM NC TREK NEO BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED FOR DILATATION AND ADVANCED WITH NO RESISTANCE. THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED ONCE TO JUST ABOVE RATED BURST PRESSURE WHEN A RUPTURE OCCURRED. RESISTANCE WAS NOTED DURING WITHDRAWAL, NO FORCE WAS APPLIED. A NON-ABBOTT NC BALLOON WAS USED TO CONTINUE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21101003 ↗MalfunctionOct 8, 2024Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Material Separation; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A LESION IN THE MID RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (MRCA) WITH MILD CALCIFICATION. THE 3.5X20MM NC TREK NEO BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) HAD RESISTANCE DURING ADVANCEMENT WITH A .014 GUIDE WIRE AND GOT STUCK BREAKING THE TIP INTO TWO PIECES AS FORCE WAS APPLIED DURING REMOVAL. THE SEPARATED TIP WAS REMOVED TOGETHER WITH THE GUIDE WIRE. ANOTHER NC TREK NEO BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT AND THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20402686 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2024Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Failure to Deflate; Deflation Problem; Difficult to Remove; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Failure to Deflate
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A LESION IN THE LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING (LAD) ARTERY WITH MODERATE CALCIFICATION AND MILD TORTUOSITY. THE 4X20MM NC TREK NEO BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS USED IN THE PROCEDURE AND THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED TO 24 ATMOSPHERES (ATM) THREE TIMES; HOWEVER, THE BALLOON ONLY PARTIALLY DEFLATED. IN THE SAME PROCEDURE A 3.5X20MM NC TREK NEO BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER WAS USED AND THE BALLOON WAS INFLATED TO 20 ATM TWICE, THE SECOND BALLOON ALSO WOULD ONLY PARTIALLY DEFLATE. DIFFERENT DEFLATION SYRINGES WERE USED IN AN ATTEMPT TO DEFLATE THE BALLOONS. BOTH BALLOONS WERE ULTIMATELY DEFLATED AND WERE REMOVED WITH A HIGH DEGREE OF FRICTION. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY REPORTED IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20078855 ↗MalfunctionNov 20, 2023Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Remove
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A MILDLY CALCIFIED RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA). AFTER INFLATION AND DEFLATION OF THE 3.5X20MM NC TREK BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) RESISTANCE WAS FELT WHEN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVED WITH A NON-ABBOTT GUIDE WIRE. THE BDC WAS ABLE TO REMOVED ON ITS OWN; HOWEVER, WITH STRONG RESISTANCE NOTED. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18176711 ↗MalfunctionMar 10, 2023Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Contamination /Decontamination Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE 3.5X20 MM NC TREK NEO BALLOON DILATATION CATHETER (BDC) WAS OPENED AND PREPPED, A PIECE OF PLASTIC WAS NOTED HANGING OFF THE SIDE OF THE BALLOON. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. A NEW BALLOON WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS IDENTIFIED THAT THE OUTER MEMBER WAS PEELED AND STRETCHED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16525252 ↗
Other Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous devices
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous223 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892815200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 death203 reports
- MINI TREK™ 1012270-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous162 reports
- Maverick²™ H7493892820200Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous161 reports
- NC TREK 1012454-08Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 recalls59 reports
- TREK™ 1012272-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous2 deaths158 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-12Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall84 reports
- NC TREK 1012453-15Abbott Vascular Inc. · Catheters, transluminal coronary angioplasty, percutaneous1 recall1 death83 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page