XIENCE Skypoint™ 1804500-15Recalls & reported problems
Abbott Vascular Inc. · XIENCE Skypoint™ Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System 5.00 mm x 15 mm / Rapid-Exchange · Class 3 · Implant
All models of XIENCE Skypoint (69)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648233630), received between Aug 2, 2022 and Nov 27, 2023 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Remove3
- Difficult to Advance2
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Failure to Advance1
- Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionNov 27, 2023Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A LESION IN THE MILDLY CALCIFIED, MILDLY TORTUOUS PROXIMAL LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING ARTERY (LAD) WITH 90% STENOSIS. AFTER IMPLANTING A 4.5X23MM XIENCE SKYPOINT STENT, A 5.0X15MM XIENCE SKYPOINT STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS) WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE ADVANCED THROUGH A NON-ABBOTT GUIDE CATHETER; HOWEVER, BECAME STUCK IN THE GUIDING CATHETER AND COULD NOT BE REMOVED. THEREFORE, THE XIENCE SKYPOINT AND GUIDING CATHETER WERE REMOVED TOGETHER AS ONE UNIT. A 4.5X15MM XIENCE SKYPOINT WAS IMPLANTED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18213185 ↗MalfunctionMay 24, 2023Difficult to Remove; Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Difficult to Remove; Failure to Advance; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT LESIONS IN THE MID AND PROXIMAL RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY (RCA) WITH SEVERE CALCIFICATION. THE LESIONS WERE PRE-DILATED. A 5X15 MM XIENCE SKYPOINT STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS) FAILED TO CROSS THE PROXIMAL RCA LESION DUE TO THE ANATOMY AND THE STENT WAS DISLODGED BUT REMAINED ON THE SDS. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED WITH RESISTANCE WITH A NON-ABBOTT GUIDE EXTENSION CATHETER. A SAME SIZED SDS WAS USED TO TREAT THE LESION. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16994764 ↗MalfunctionAug 2, 2022Difficult to Remove; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Advance; Difficult to Remove; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Difficult to Advance
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE WAS TO TREAT A LESION IN THE LEFT MAIN (LM) ARTERY WITH 75% STENOSIS, NO CALCIFICATION AND NO TORTUOSITY. THE 5.0X15MM XIENCE SKYPOINT STENT DELIVERY SYSTEM (SDS) MET RESISTANCE AND FAILED TO CROSS DUE TO DEVICE INTERACTION WITH THE GUIDE WIRE. AFTER REMOVAL, AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE AND FAILED TO CROSS THE LESION AGAIN. THERE WAS RESISTANCE DURING REMOVAL WITH THE GUIDE WIRE. ALL DEVICES WERE REMOVED AS A SINGLE UNIT. THERE WERE NO OTHER DEVICE ISSUES SUCH AS SHAFT SEPARATION AND STENT DISLODGEMENT. A NON-ABBOTT DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECT. THERE WAS NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15148168 ↗
Other Coronary drug-eluting stent devices
- SYNERGY™ H7493926038300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent8 deaths124 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent7 deaths106 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926020300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent9 deaths90 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926016250Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths82 reports
- XIENCE Sierra™ 1550350-33Abbott Vascular Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent1 recall32 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30022UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent6 deaths76 reports
- SYNERGY™ H7493926024300Boston Scientific Corporation · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths75 reports
- Resolute Onyx™ RONYX30015UXMedtronic, Inc. · Coronary drug-eluting stent3 deaths73 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page