Skip to content

XACT™ 83031-01Recalls & reported problems

Abbott Vascular Inc. · XACT™ Transcarotid Stent System 9.0 mm x 40 mm Tapered · Class 3 · Implant

All models of XACT (19)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08717648356674), received between Nov 6, 2024 and May 15, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Markings/Labelling Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 2 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Markings/Labelling Problem2
  • Activation Failure1
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Mechanical Jam1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Stroke/CVA1
  • Thrombosis/Thrombus1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 15, 2026Mechanical Jam; Activation Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PROCEDURE PERFORMED WAS TO TREAT A MILDLY CALCIFIED INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY. UPON DEPLOYMENT OF THE 9X40MM XACT CAROTID SELF-EXPANDING STENT, A PROBLEM OCCURRED WITH THE DEPLOYMENT MECHANISM [THUMBWHEEL], AND THE STENT COMPLETELY FAILED TO DEPLOY. THE DEVICE WAS TESTED ON THE TABLE AND THE STENT WAS DEPLOYED. AN UNSPECIFIED DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. RETURNED DEVICE ANALYSIS OBSERVED THERE WAS A SEPARATION NOTED AT THE SHAFT/SHEATH BOND AREA. THE KNOB TURNED, AND THE STENT SHEATH RETRACTED WITH NO RESISTANCE NOTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25188271 ↗
  • InjuryJul 23, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2025, A 9TX40 XACT STENT WAS IMPLANTED IN THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID AND COMMON CAROTID WITH GREAT POST PROCEDURE FLOW; HOWEVER, 36 HOURS AFTER THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT SUFFERED A STROKE AND CONFIRMED VIA CT SCAN. STENT THROMBOSIS WAS CONFIRMED VIA ANGIOGRAM. THEREFORE, THROMBECTOMY WAS PERFORMED IN THE LEFT CAROTID ARTERY AND FLOW WAS RESTORED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED 24 HOURS LATER WITH ANTI-PLATELET THERAPY. THERE WAS NO ADVERSE PATIENT SEQUELA AND NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Stroke/CVA; Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 22580621 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2024Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON 10/14/2024, THE CHIPBOARD BOX OF THE XACT SELF EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM (SESS) WAS NOTED TO HAVE THE CATHETER LENGTH LABELED AS "60 MM" RATHER THAN "60 CM". THE CATHETER LENGTH IS LABELED ON NUMEROUS AREAS OF DEVICE, INCLUDING THE CHIPBOARD BOX, POUCH LABEL AND IFU. ALL OTHER LOCATIONS WHERE THE CATHETER LENGTH IS LABELED WERE CORRECT IN INDICATING 60CM. THE STENT WAS IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024 WITHOUT ISSUE IN THE LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY WITH HEAVY CALCIFICATION. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS AND THERE WAS NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20624750 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 6, 2024Device Markings/Labelling Problem; Device Markings/Labelling Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CHIPBOARD BOX OF THE EXACT SELF EXPANDING STENT SYSTEM (SESS) WAS NOTED TO HAVE THE CATHETER LENGTH LABELED AS "60 MM" RATHER THAN "60 CM". THE CATHETER LENGTH IS LABELED ON NUMEROUS AREAS OF DEVICE, INCLUDING THE CHIPBOARD BOX, POUCH LABEL AND IFU. ALL OTHER LOCATIONS WHERE THE CATHETER LENGTH IS LABELED WERE CORRECT IN INDICATING 60CM. THERE WAS NO DEVICE USE OR PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. THERE WAS NO REPORTED CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20622964 ↗

Other STENT, CAROTID devices

All STENT, CAROTID devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page