Skip to content

HANAROSTENT® Esophagus TTS(CCC) ECBA-20-150-230Recalls & reported problems

M.I.Tech Co., Ltd. · Full Covered metallic esophagus stent · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08806367088598), received between Dec 16, 2022 and Nov 12, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Material Fragmentation2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Entrapment of Device1

Patient problems

  • Abdominal Pain2
  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • Obstruction/Occlusion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 12, 2025Break; Material Fragmentation; Break; Material Fragmentation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WENT TO AN OUTSIDE FACILITY AND UNDERWENT CT IMAGING DUE TO ABDOMINAL PAIN, AND IT WAS REVEALED THAT A FRAGMENT OF THE STENT HAD BROKEN OFF AND MIGRATED INTO THE SMALL BOWEL, LIKELY CAUSING SMALL BOWEL OBSTRUCTION. PATIENT IS SCHEDULED FOR A DOUBLE-BALLOON ENTEROSTOMY TO RETRIEVE THE BROKEN STENT.

    Patient problems: Abdominal Pain; Foreign Body In Patient; Obstruction/Occlusion

    MAUDE report 23531138 ↗
  • InjuryJul 28, 2023Break; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Break; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    AN OLYMPUS REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED TO OLYMPUS, ON BEHALF OF THE CUSTOMER, THE ESOPHAGEAL HANAROSTENT WAS USED OFF LABEL AND PLACED IN THE PATIENT'S UPPER DUODENUM. IT WAS IN THE PATIENT FOR A PERIOD OF TIME AND THE PATIENT COMPLAINED OF ABDOMINAL PAIN AND WENT TO THE EMERGENCY ROOM. IT WAS FOUND THROUGH A SCAN THAT THE DEVICE BECAME DISLODGED AND BROKE IN HALF. THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN FOR SURGERY TO REMOVE THE DEVICE. THERE WERE NO REPORTS OF PATIENT HARM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: Abdominal Pain

    MAUDE report 17412986 ↗
  • InjuryDec 16, 2022Entrapment of Device; Material Fragmentation

    THE CUSTOMER REPORTS DURING AN ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY (EGD) AND REMOVAL OF AN ESOPHAGEAL HANAROSTENT (THAT HAD BEEN PLACED A MONTH PRIOR AT A DIFFERENT LOCATION), THE STENT BROKE APART DURING REMOVAL. THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT ABLE TO REMOVE ALL OF THE STENT PIECES. THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT CONCERNED BECAUSE THE CUSTOMER WAS SCHEDULED FOR ANOTHER UNSPECIFIED SURGERY NEXT WEEK. NO ADDITIONAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 15997593 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Esophageal devices

All Prosthesis, Esophageal devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.