Skip to content

LaseMD Ultra LaseMD Ultra U120VRecalls & reported problems

Lutronic Corporation · LaseMD Ultra U120V · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08809447653044), received between Jul 16, 2025 and Jul 16, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 2 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2

Patient problems

  • Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 16, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED PRONOUNCED EDEMA POST SOFT TISSUE COAGULATION TREATMENT WITH A LASEMD ULTRA DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction

    MAUDE report 22523716 ↗
  • InjuryJul 16, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT EXPERIENCED PRONOUNCED EDEMA POST SOFT TISSUE COAGULATION TREATMENT WITH A LASEMD ULTRA DEVICE. CYNOSURE LUTRONIC CLINICAL TEAM COLLECTED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DETERMINED THE CASE TO BE INCONCLUSIVE. SITE PHYSICIAN SUSPECTS THE PATIENT HAD AN ALLERGIC TYPE RESPONSE. TREATMENT PARAMETERS USED WERE WITHIN THE RECOMMENDED RANGE. NUMBING CREAM WAS APPLIED PRIOR TO TREATMENT. POST TREATMENT BE FACIAL MASK, VITAMIN C AMPOULE, PREDNISONE ATAR AND HEALITE TREATMENT WERE APPLIED AS PREVENTATIVE. PATIENT REPORTED THE FOLLOWING DAY AFTER TREATMENT THAT HER FACE WAS MORE SWOLLEN AND SHE WAS UNABLE TO SEE. SITE CONFIRMED PATIENT HAD SEVERE PERIORBITAL EDEMA AND CLEAR YELLOW DRAINAGE. THE CASE WAS DISCUSSED WITH AN INFECTIOUS DISEASE DOCTOR, WHO RECOMMENDED THAT THE PATIENT RECEIVE DIRECT ADMISSION FOR IV ANTIBIOTICS AND IV STEROIDS. THE PATIENT RECEIVED V ANCEF, CLINDAMYCIN AND SOLUMEDROL. LABS SHOWED LEUKOCYTOSIS 13 > 15, ELEVATED LACTIC ACID, 3.3. FOLLOWING THE IV TREATMENT IT WAS REPORTED THAT THESE NUMBERS TRENDED DOWN AS EXPECTED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED TWO (2) DAYS LATER AND IT WAS REPORTED THAT THEY RECOVERED WELL AND CAN SEE SIGNIFICANT IMPROVEMEN

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction

    MAUDE report 22521283 ↗

Other Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices

All Powered Laser Surgical Instrument devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page