NR Line GFX3011SRecalls & reported problems
Dentium Co., Ltd. · Endosseous dental implant · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 10
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08809460302356), received between Oct 12, 2017 and Feb 13, 2026 — classified as 10 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate6
- Osseointegration Problem3
- Break2
- Fracture2
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant7
- Inadequate Osseointegration7
- Unspecified Infection4
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 13, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate
THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE WITHIN 1 YEAR, APPROXIMATELY 4 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. PATIENT'S X-RAY WAS PROVIDED. THE BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE III. THE ORAL HYGIENE AROUND IMPLANT SITE WAS MODERATE. BONE RESORPTION WAS FOUND DURING THE REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS NOT USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 24339827 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE WITHIN 1 YEAR, APPROXIMATELY 2 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. THE BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE I. THE ORAL HYGIENE AROUND IMPLANT SITE WAS GOOD. LOCAL INFECTION & PAIN WERE FOUND DURING THE REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS NOT USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 21105990 ↗InjuryFeb 19, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate
THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE, 6 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE I, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. LOCAL INFECTION WAS OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18731138 ↗InjuryNov 30, 2023Fracture; Fracture
THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO IMPLANT FRACTURE APPROXIMATELY 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE III, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. LOCAL INFECTION AND PERI-IMPLANTITIS WERE OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. TRAUMA HISTORY RELATED TO IMPLANT FRACTURE WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED BUT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18242868 ↗InjuryMar 19, 2020Fracture; Fracture
THE DENTAL IMPLANT GFX3011S WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2020 DUE TO A FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT 3 YEARS AND 1 MONTH AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS HISTORY OF CARDIAC DISEASE AND COMPROMISED IMMUNITY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE OPERATION. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 9857395 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
THE DENTAL IMPLANT GFX3011S WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AFTER THE IMPLANTATION DATE. THE PATIENT HAS HISTORY OF VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY AND HAS BEEN WILL NEED FURTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 7172268 ↗InjuryNov 13, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
THE DENTAL IMPLANT (B)(4) WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED THAT BONE QUALITY MAY HAVE CAUSED THE IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 7025338 ↗InjuryOct 12, 2017Break; Break
THE DENTAL IMPLANT GFX3011S BROKE DURING IMPLANTATION. THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS REMOVED. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6945513 ↗InjuryOct 12, 2017Break; Break
THE DENTAL IMPLANT GFX3011S BROKE ON IMPLANTATION AND WAS REMOVED FROM THE IMPLANT SITE. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATION.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 6945457 ↗InjuryOct 12, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem
THE DENTAL IMPLANT GFX3011S WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 5 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED THAT LOCAL INFECTION AT THE SITE OF THE IMPLANT CAUSED THE IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 6945263 ↗
Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM43,616 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM40,404 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM27,400 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,621 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLA Titanium BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM25,298 reports
- Straumann® Dental Implant System Roxolid® SLA Impl. SLA Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM23,448 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,320 reports
- STRAUMANN BONE LEVEL TAPERED IMPLANT SLActive Roxolid BLInstitut Straumann AG · IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM22,267 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page