Skip to content

NR Line GFX3011SRecalls & reported problems

Dentium Co., Ltd. · Endosseous dental implant · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
10
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 08809460302356), received between Oct 12, 2017 and Feb 13, 2026 — classified as 10 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (6 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Failure to Osseointegrate6
  • Osseointegration Problem3
  • Break2
  • Fracture2

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant7
  • Inadequate Osseointegration7
  • Unspecified Infection4
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 13, 2026Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE WITHIN 1 YEAR, APPROXIMATELY 4 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. PATIENT'S X-RAY WAS PROVIDED. THE BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE III. THE ORAL HYGIENE AROUND IMPLANT SITE WAS MODERATE. BONE RESORPTION WAS FOUND DURING THE REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS NOT USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 24339827 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2025Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE WITHIN 1 YEAR, APPROXIMATELY 2 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. THE BONE QUALITY WAS TYPE I. THE ORAL HYGIENE AROUND IMPLANT SITE WAS GOOD. LOCAL INFECTION & PAIN WERE FOUND DURING THE REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS NOT USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. THE PATIENT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21105990 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 19, 2024Failure to Osseointegrate; Failure to Osseointegrate

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO OSSEOINTEGRATION FAILURE, 6 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE I, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS GOOD. LOCAL INFECTION WAS OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. THE PATIENT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18731138 ↗
  • InjuryNov 30, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    THE DOCTOR REPORTED THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO IMPLANT FRACTURE APPROXIMATELY 1 YEAR AND 5 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANT PLACEMENT. BONE QUALITY AROUND THE AREA WAS TYPE III, AND ORAL HYGIENE AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MODERATE. LOCAL INFECTION AND PERI-IMPLANTITIS WERE OBSERVED DURING THE IMPLANT REMOVAL SURGERY. BONE AUGMENTATION MATERIAL WAS USED IN IMPLANT PLACEMENT SURGERY. TRAUMA HISTORY RELATED TO IMPLANT FRACTURE WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED BUT WILL NEED ANOTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18242868 ↗
  • InjuryMar 19, 2020Fracture; Fracture

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT GFX3011S WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2020 DUE TO A FRACTURE OF THE IMPLANT 3 YEARS AND 1 MONTH AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT HAS HISTORY OF CARDIAC DISEASE AND COMPROMISED IMMUNITY. THE PATIENT REQUIRED BONE AUGMENTATION FOR THE OPERATION. THE PATIENT HAS RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 9857395 ↗
  • InjuryJan 8, 2018Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT GFX3011S WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AFTER THE IMPLANTATION DATE. THE PATIENT HAS HISTORY OF VITAMIN D DEFICIENCY AND HAS BEEN WILL NEED FURTHER SURGICAL INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 7172268 ↗
  • InjuryNov 13, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT (B)(4) WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 3 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED THAT BONE QUALITY MAY HAVE CAUSED THE IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 7025338 ↗
  • InjuryOct 12, 2017Break; Break

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT GFX3011S BROKE DURING IMPLANTATION. THE DENTAL IMPLANT WAS REMOVED. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 6945513 ↗
  • InjuryOct 12, 2017Break; Break

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT GFX3011S BROKE ON IMPLANTATION AND WAS REMOVED FROM THE IMPLANT SITE. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATION.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 6945457 ↗
  • InjuryOct 12, 2017Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem; Failure to Osseointegrate; Osseointegration Problem

    THE DENTAL IMPLANT GFX3011S WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE 5 MONTHS AFTER IMPLANTATION. THE DOCTOR INDICATED THAT LOCAL INFECTION AT THE SITE OF THE IMPLANT CAUSED THE IMPLANT REMOVAL. THE PATIENT HAS NO SIGNIFICANT MEDICAL HISTORY AND HAS BEEN RECOVERED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6945263 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page