Skip to content

Mi1250 SYNCHRONY 2 PIN FLEXsoft 36677Recalls & reported problems

Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Gesellschaft m.b.H. · Cochlear Implant · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 09008737366773), received between Jan 11, 2021 and Apr 9, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (3 reports).

4 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P000025); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Migration3
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Microbial Contamination of Device1

Patient problems

  • Bacterial Infection4
  • Failure of Implant2
  • Extraskeletal ossification1
  • Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 9, 2024Microbial Contamination of Device; Microbial Contamination of Device

    DUE TO INFECTION THE DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE USER SUFFERED FROM OTITIS MEDIA WHICH SPREAD TO THE LEVEL OF THE IMPLANT. THE INFECTION HAS BEEN CONFIRMED BY CULTURES: STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS. THE ISSUE STARTED 2,5 MONTHS PRIOR. AT THE EXPLANTATION SURGERY THE HOUSING WAS IN PLACE AND HEARING WAS NOT AFFECTED. RE-IMPLANTATION IS CONSIDERED AT A LATER TIME POINT.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection

    MAUDE report 19069150 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 2, 2022Migration; Migration

    THE USER UNDERWENT A REPOSITIONING SURGERY AT THE BEGINNING OF (B)(6) 2022 DUE TO MOVEMENT OF THE IMPLANT TOWARDS THE PINNA. REPORTEDLY, THE USER THEN PUT ON HIS AUDIO PROCESSOR AND REPORTED A FUZZY SOUND QUALITY. A CT IS PLANNED TO CONFIRM THE PLACEMENT.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 13420777 ↗
  • InjuryJun 25, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE USER SUFFERED FROM A PERSISTENT INFECTION OVER THE LEFT IMPLANT. LATER INCISION AND DRAINAGE WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021 AND THE USER WAS TREATED WITH AUGMENTIN TO TREAT THE FLUID COLLECTION IN THE LEFT POSTAURICULAR AREA. PRELIMINARY LAB RESULTS OF CULTURED FLUID REVEALED (B)(6), AND THE CLINIC STARTED TREATMENT WITH BACTROBAN TOPICAL OINTMENT ON (B)(6) 2021. EXPLANTATION TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2021. THE DEVICE HOUSING WAS FOUND IN PLACE AND ELECTRODE ARRAY FULLY INSERTED. THE PLAN WAS TO LEAVE THE ELECTRODE ARRAY IN THE COCHLEA AND LET THE INFECTION FULLY RESOLVE BEFORE REIMPLANTING A NEW DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection

    MAUDE report 12064986 ↗
  • InjuryJun 23, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE USER SUFFERED FROM A PERSISTENT INFECTION OVER THE LEFT IMPLANT. EXPLANTATION TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2021. THE DEVICE HOUSING WAS FOUND IN PLACE AND ELECTRODE ARRAY FULLY INSERTED.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection

    MAUDE report 12047842 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 10, 2021Migration; Migration

    THE RECIPIENT'S HEARING PERFORMANCE WITH THE DEVICE IS AFFECTED. IMAGING CONFIRMED THAT THE ELECTRODE ARRAY IS NOT COMPLETELY INSERTED IN THE COCHLEA. AT A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021 IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE ELECTRODE HAD BEEN PUSHED OUT DUE TO SOFT TISSUE, FIBROTIC GROWTH AND 2-3 CHANNELS WERE FOUND EXTRA-COCHLEAR. DESPITE EFFORTS THE ARRAY COULD NOT BE INSERTED ANY FURTHER AND THEREFORE IT WAS LEFT IN PLACE AT THE SAME INSERTION DEPTH.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11307676 ↗
  • InjuryJan 11, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Migration; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Migration

    THE RECIPIENT'S HEARING PERFORMANCE WITH THE DEVICE WAS AFFECTED. AT A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021 IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT ONLY 2-3- CONTACTS OF THE ELECTRODE WERE STILL INSIDE THE COCHLEA AND THE REST WERE EXTRA-COCHLEAR. ACCORDING TO THE SURGEON, THE ELECTRODE ARAY HAD BEEN PUSHED OUT BY OSSIFICATION AND FIBROTIC GROWTH. DESPITE EFFORTS THE ARRAY COULD NOT BE INSERTED ANY FURTHER AND THEREFORE IT WAS LEFT IN PLACE AT THE SAME INSERTION DEPTH. AFTERWARDS, THE USER COULD DETECT AUDITORY SENSATION ON 2 ACTIVE ELECTRODES. THE USER WAS RE-IMPLANTED WITH A COMPETITOR'S DEVICE ON (B)(6) 2021. AT RE-IMPLANTATION IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT OSSIFICATION AT THE BASAL TURN PUSHED THE ELECTRODE OUT OF THE COCHLEA.

    Patient problems: Extraskeletal ossification; Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected

    MAUDE report 11146800 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 11, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE RECIPIENT HAS HAD A PERSISTENT, RE-OCCURRING INFECTION OVER THE LEFT IMPLANT WHICH LIMITED THE USE OF THE AUDIO PROCESSOR. THE RECIPIENT HAS CONTINUED ON MEDICAL MANAGEMENT AND HAS HAD NO FURTHER SWELLING AND NO FURTHER SURGERY. HE HAS BEEN WEARING THE DEVICE CONSISTENTLY SINCE (B)(6) 2020.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection

    MAUDE report 11145201 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P000025. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2356-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, Classified
    Mi1250 SYNCHRONY 2, Item Numbers: a) 39541, FLEXSOFT S-Vector; b) 39545, FLEX28 S-Vector; c) 39547, FLEX26 S-Vector; Cochlear Implant
  • Z-2136-2019 · Oct 16, 2018 · Terminated
    MED EL Cochlear Implant System, Mi1000 MED EL CONCERTO, sold under the following implant types: a. Mil000 CONCERTO PIN +FLEX28; b. Mi1000 CONCERTO +FLEX28; c. Mi100
  • Z-2138-2019 · Oct 16, 2018 · Terminated
    MED EL Cochlear Implant System, PULSARci100 Standard - Product Usage: The PULSARci100 Implant is an implantable part of the MED EL Cochlear Implant System and can only be used toge
  • Z-2137-2019 · Oct 16, 2018 · Terminated
    MED EL Cochlear Implant System, SONATATIi100, sold under the following implant types: a. SONATAti100 FLEXsoft; b. SONATAti100 H Standard; c. SONATAti100 Standard

Other Implant, Cochlear devices

All Implant, Cochlear devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page