Mi1250 SYNCHRONY 2 FLEX28 36682Recalls & reported problems
Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Gesellschaft m.b.H. · Cochlear Implant · Class 3 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
Quick summary
This Med-El SYNCHRONY 2 cochlear implant has 107 reports, no deaths and 44 injuries. Many reports describe the implant failing, moving out of place, or electrical problems that affected hearing, and some describe infection or swelling that led to the implant being removed and replaced. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 108
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 45
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 108 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 09008737366827), received between Jan 16, 2020 and Sep 15, 2026 — classified as 45 injuries, 63 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (33 reports).
4 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P000025); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration33
- Impedance Problem31
- Output Problem28
- Device Appears to Trigger Rejection16
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem8
- Insufficient Device Problem Information4
- Circuit Failure3
- Device Handling Problem1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant71
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions21
- Skin Tears11
- Insufficient Information6
- Tissue Breakdown5
- Head Injury4
- Bacterial Infection3
- Undesired Nerve Stimulation2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 108 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 15, 2026Impedance Problem
In situ measurements show 4 channels with high impedance.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50772732 ↗InjuryJul 28, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
Because of persistent swelling and suspected infection, the cochlear implant was explanted. Meanwhile, a new cochlear implant was implanted in the contralateral ear to maintain the user's auditory rehabilitation.
Patient problems: Medical device site infection; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 50050721 ↗InjuryMay 28, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
REPORTEDLY, THE ELECTRODE LEAD HAS PIERCED THE WALL OF THE EAR CANAL. THE DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED ON (b)(6)2025.
Patient problems: Skin Tears
MAUDE report 25315046 ↗MalfunctionMay 19, 2026Impedance Problem
THE HEARING PERFORMANCE IS AFFECTED AND IN SITU TESTING SHOWED AFFECTED CHANNELS. THE USER IS SCHEDULED FOR REIMPLANTATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25214011 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2026Circuit Failure
THE USER HAS NO HEARING SENSATION WITH THE DEVICE. REIMPLANTATION IS CONSIDERED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 25199775 ↗MalfunctionMar 24, 2026Migration
THE IMPLANT HOUSING HAD SHIFTED AND THE PATIENT'S UNDERSTANDING HAD DETERIORATED. THE IMPLANT WAS DAMAGED DURING THE REPOSITION SURGERY, THEREFORE THE USER WAS REIMPLANTED WITH A NEW DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24679049 ↗InjuryMar 23, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE USER HAD AN EXTRUSION OF THE ELECTRODE ARRAY DUE TO AN INFECTION AND THE CUL-DE-SAC CLOSURE OF THE EAR CANAL. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE DEVICE AND IMPLANTED A NEW ONE.
Patient problems: Tissue Breakdown
MAUDE report 24661627 ↗MalfunctionFeb 5, 2026Impedance Problem
THE HEARING PERFORMANCE IS AFFECTED. THE USER WAS REIMPLANTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24268114 ↗MalfunctionJan 21, 2026Impedance Problem
THE DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO POOR SOUND QUALITY. THE USER HAS BENE REIMPLANTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24129937 ↗MalfunctionDec 19, 2025Impedance Problem; Impedance Problem
THE USER'S SPEECH-TEST SCORES DECLINED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23848473 ↗InjuryNov 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE USER WAS INITIALLY SCHEDULED TO UNDERGO A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFLAMMATION AROUND THE IMPLANT. THE USER WAS REIMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Inflammation
MAUDE report 23646636 ↗MalfunctionNov 18, 2025Impedance Problem; Impedance Problem
THE USER WAS RE-IMPLANTED DUE TO PERFORMANCE DETERIORATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23579831 ↗InjuryNov 12, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE RECIPIENT HAS EXPLANTATION/RE-IMPLANT SURGERY BOOKED FOR (B)(6) 2025 DUE TO ONGOING INFECTIONS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 23531394 ↗MalfunctionOct 17, 2025Impedance Problem; Impedance Problem
THE SURGEON HAD DIFFICULTY WITH THE INSERTION ITSELF AND SPENT A LONG TIME HANDLING THE ELECTRODE. DUE TO CONCERNS OVER THE POOR ART RESPONSE, THE SURGEON PREFERRED TO USE THE BACK-UP DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23321755 ↗InjuryOct 8, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
A CHOLESTEATOMA DEVELOPED WHICH RESULTED IN A DEHISCENCE WHICH LIKELY WEAKENED THE BLIND-SAC AND ALLOWED THE ELECTRODE TO EXTRUDE. THE USER WAS RE-IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Skin Tears
MAUDE report 23242060 ↗MalfunctionAug 12, 2025Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
AN EXPLANT SURGERY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2025, DUE TO POOR PERFORMANCE WITH THE IMPLANT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 22783708 ↗InjuryJul 17, 2025Migration; Migration
THE RECIPIENT RETURNED TO CENTER WITH CONCERNS FOR CHANGES IN IMPEDANCE. THE USER HAS BEEN RE-IMPLANTED. THE ELECTRODE LEAD WAS FOUND TO HAVE EXTRUDED THROUGH THE TYMPANIC MEMBRANE AND 2 + CHANNELS WERE FOUND EXTRA-COCHLEAR. THIS REPORT REFERS TO 9710014-2025-00015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE REFER TO THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Head Injury
MAUDE report 22528422 ↗InjuryMay 16, 2025Impedance Problem; Impedance Problem
THE RECIPIENT RETURNED TO CENTER WITH CONCERNS FOR CHANGES IN IMPEDANCE ON CHANNELS 10-12 THAT OCCURRED IN FEBRUARY 2025 MEASURED VIA SCHOOL AUDIOLOGIST. RE-IMPLANTATION IS PLANNED FOR (B)(6) 2025.
Patient problems: Head Injury
MAUDE report 22033768 ↗MalfunctionMar 18, 2025Impedance Problem; Impedance Problem
REPORTEDLY, THE USER HAS ALMOST NO SOUND RESPONSE. THE USER WAS RE-IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2025.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21633294 ↗MalfunctionMar 11, 2025Circuit Failure; Circuit Failure
THE USER SUFFERED FROM A TEMPORAL BONE FRACTURE AND HAS SINCE THEN HAD NO HEARING PERCEPTION. RE-IMPLANTATION IS BEING CONSIDERED AND WAS SCHEDULED FOR (B)(6) 2025, HOWEVER DUE TO A HEART CONDITION HAD TO BE POSTPONED. NO NEW DATE HAS BEEN SET YET.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Head Injury
MAUDE report 21573312 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
THE USER'S MOTHER REPORTED THAT HER CHILD'S IMPLANT WAS COMING OUT OF HER HEAD. AT IMPLANTATION 2 CHANNELS WERE LEFT EXTRA-COCHLEAR. THE USER HAS BEEN EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2025. IT HAS BEEN DECIDED TO WAIT FOR THE SKIN TO HEAL BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH REIMPLANTATION. THIS REPORT REFERS TO 9710014-2025-00158. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE REFER TO THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Skin Tears
MAUDE report 21399236 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection
THE USER'S MOTHER REPORTED THAT HER CHILD'S IMPLANT WAS COMING OUT OF HER HEAD. THE CHILD HAD BEEN HOLDING HER HEAD FOR THE PAST FEW DAYS, BUT THE MOTHER DID NOT NOTICE THE IMPLANT PROTRUDING UNTIL THE NIGHT OF (B)(6) 2025. THE USER HAS BEEN EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2025. IT HAS BEEN DECIDED TO WAIT FOR THE SKIN TO HEAL BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH REIMPLANTATION.
Patient problems: Skin Tears
MAUDE report 21396030 ↗MalfunctionFeb 12, 2025Migration; Migration
THE USER'S HEARING PERFORMANCE WITH THE DEVICE IS AFFECTED. THE USER HAS REPORTEDLY NOT USED HIS AUDIO PROCESSOR FOR THE LAST YEAR STATING HE ONLY HEARS NOISE WITH IT. THE USER HAS BEEN REIMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21364626 ↗MalfunctionFeb 12, 2025Impedance Problem; Impedance Problem
THE HEARING PERFORMANCE WITH THE DEVICE WAS AFFECTED. THE USER WAS REIMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21364318 ↗MalfunctionFeb 4, 2025Impedance Problem; Impedance Problem
THE USER'S HEARING PERFORMANCE WITH THE DEVICE IS AFFECTED. TWO MONTHS AFTER SURGERY, 4 CHANNELS SHOWED HIGH IMPEDANCE, BUT THE USER WAS STILL HAPPY WITH THE SOUND QUALITY WHEN ALL CHANNELS WERE ACTIVE AND REFUSED ADJUSTMENTS. HOWEVER, IN (B)(6) 2025, THE USER COMPLAINED TO HER FAMILY THAT THE SOUND SUDDENLY BECAME VERY SOFT AND WIRED WITH HEAD MOVEMENT (SOUND WAS PRESENT WHEN HER HEAD WAS STRAIGHT BUT DISAPPEARED WHEN TILTED) FOR 2 DAYS THEN THE SOUND DISAPPEARED. SPEECH UNDERSTANDING HAS DETERIORATED. RE-IMPLANTATION IS CONSIDERED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21305021 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P000025. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2356-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedMi1250 SYNCHRONY 2, Item Numbers: a) 39541, FLEXSOFT S-Vector; b) 39545, FLEX28 S-Vector; c) 39547, FLEX26 S-Vector; Cochlear Implant
- Z-2138-2019 · Oct 16, 2018 · TerminatedMED EL Cochlear Implant System, PULSARci100 Standard - Product Usage: The PULSARci100 Implant is an implantable part of the MED EL Cochlear Implant System and can only be used toge
- Z-2137-2019 · Oct 16, 2018 · TerminatedMED EL Cochlear Implant System, SONATATIi100, sold under the following implant types: a. SONATAti100 FLEXsoft; b. SONATAti100 H Standard; c. SONATAti100 Standard Product
- Z-2136-2019 · Oct 16, 2018 · TerminatedMED EL Cochlear Implant System, Mi1000 MED EL CONCERTO, sold under the following implant types: a. Mil000 CONCERTO PIN +FLEX28; b. Mi1000 CONCERTO +FLEX28; c. Mi1000 CONCE
Other Implant, Cochlear devices
- HiRes™ Ultra CI HiFocus™ MS Electrode CI-1600-04Advanced Bionics AG · Implant, Cochlear2,918 reports
- Cochlear® Nucleus® CI512 cochlear ImplantCochlear Limited · IMPLANT, COCHLEAR2,771 reports
- Cochlear® Nucleus® CI622 cochlear Implant with Slim Straight electrodeCochlear Limited · Implant, cochlear2,115 reports
- Cochlear® Nucleus® CI632 cochlear Implant with Slim Modiolar electrodeCochlear Limited · Implant, cochlear2,057 reports
- Nucleus Z60353Cochlear Limited · IMPLANT, COCHLEAR2 deaths1,815 reports
- Cochlear® Nucleus® CI522 cochlear Implant with Slim Straight electrodeCochlear Limited · IMPLANT, COCHLEAR1,475 reports
- Cochlear® Nucleus® CI612 cochlear ImplantCochlear Limited · Implant, cochlear1,150 reports
- Nucleus Z190574Cochlear Limited · IMPLANT, COCHLEAR981 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page