Skip to content

Mi1250 SYNCHRONY 2 PIN FLEXsoft S-Vector Magnet 39540Recalls & reported problems

Med-El Elektromedizinische Geräte Gesellschaft m.b.H. · Cochlear Implant · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 09008737395407), received between Mar 28, 2022 and Sep 16, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Impedance Problem” (3 reports).

4 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P000025); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 1 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Impedance Problem3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Device Appears to Trigger Rejection2
  • Migration2
  • Circuit Failure1
  • Output Problem1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant3
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • Tissue Breakdown2
  • Discomfort1
  • Head Injury1
  • Post Operative Wound Infection1
  • Skin Tears1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 16, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    The user has been explanted because of infection.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50784366 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 1, 2026Migration

    REDUCED PERFORMANCE WAS REPORTED. TWO CHANNELS WERE LEFT EXTRA-COCHLEAR AT IMPLANTATION. DESPITE REFITTING AND AURAL REHABILITATION, THERE HAS BEEN NO IMPROVEMENT. RE-INSERTION IS PLANNED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25346246 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 14, 2026Impedance Problem

    HEARING PERFORMANCE WITH THE DEVICE IS AFFECTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24874029 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2026Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE USER WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO POST-AURICULAR SKIN BREAKDOWN WITH PARTIAL IMPLANT EXTRUSION.

    Patient problems: Skin Tears; Tissue Breakdown

    MAUDE report 24276631 ↗
  • InjuryJan 19, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE USER DEVELOPED A WOUND INFECTION 2 WEEKS AFTER THE INITIAL IMPLANTATION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE INFECTION WORSENED SO THAT AN EXPLANTATION WAS PERFORMED. THE DEVICE WAS EXPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2025.

    Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection

    MAUDE report 24108433 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 27, 2025Migration; Migration

    THE DEVICE HAD TO BE REVISED DUE TO A DISLOCATION OF THE IMPLANT. THE DEVICE WAS REPOSITIONED ON (B)(6) 2025. THE REPOSITIONING PROCEDURE WAS DONE WITHOUT TOUCHING THE ELECTRODE; HOWEVER, THE NEXT CT-SCAN CHECK REVEALED THAT THE ELECTRODE MIGRATED OUT OF THE COCHLEA, WITH SHOWING ONLY 3 OR 4 CHANNELS IN THE BASAL PART OF THE COCHLEA. IT WAS THEREFORE DECIDED TO REOPEN THE SUTURES ON THE SAME DAY, TO REINSERT THE ELECTRODE. ONCE THE ELECTRODE WAS LOCATED, IT WAS DECIDED TO EXPLANT THE DEVICE. AFTER EXPLANTATION, DAMAGE TO THE ELECTRODE WAS OBSERVED. THE DEVICE SHOWED FOUR CHANNELS, AND THE FRONT PART OF THE ELECTRODE HAD DISAPPEARED AND COULD NO LONGER BE FOUND. THE USER WAS RE-IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Discomfort

    MAUDE report 22901846 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 17, 2025Impedance Problem; Impedance Problem

    THE USER'S HEARING PERFORMANCE WITH THE DEVICE IS AFFECTED. NO TRAUMA HAS BEEN REPORTED. THE USER HAS BEEN RE-IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21627483 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 5, 2025Device Appears to Trigger Rejection; Device Appears to Trigger Rejection

    THE USER SUFFERED FROM AN INFECTION AND AN EXPOSED IMPLANT. IT WAS DECIDED TO EXPLANT THE DEVICE. THIS REPORT REFERS TO 9710014-2025-00101. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE REFER TO THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Tissue Breakdown

    MAUDE report 21310110 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 23, 2025Impedance Problem; Impedance Problem

    THE USER SHOWED A HIGH GROUND PATH IMPEDANCE (GPI) BEGINNING IN AUG-2024 AFTER EXPERIENCING A TRAUMA AT THE IMPLANT SITE. THE USER WAS REIMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Head Injury

    MAUDE report 21217807 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 28, 2022Circuit Failure; Output Problem; Circuit Failure; Output Problem

    THE USER BEGAN EXHIBITING CONCERNS WITH RIGHT IMPLANT ABOUT 2 WEEKS AGO (B)(6) 2022). FIRST, THE USER THREW AND BROKE THE PRIMARY PROCESSOR, SO THE FAMILY STARTED USING THE BACK UP PROCESSOR. IT WORKED FINE FOR A COUPLE OF DAYS, THEN THE DL-COIL BEGAN INTERMITTENTLY FLASHING RED WHILE ON THE HEAD, WHICH THEN BECAME A CONSTANT RED FLASH. MOTHER REPORTEDLY REPLACED ALL EXTERNAL COMPONENTS, BUT THE DL-COIL FLASHING PERSISTED. SINCE THE CHILD WAS EXHIBITING NO SIGNS OF HEARING FROM THE IMPLANT THEY DISCONTINUED USE OF THE PROCESSOR ON THAT SIDE.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 13928058 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under P000025. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2356-2024 · Apr 18, 2024 · Open, Classified
    Mi1250 SYNCHRONY 2, Item Numbers: a) 39541, FLEXSOFT S-Vector; b) 39545, FLEX28 S-Vector; c) 39547, FLEX26 S-Vector; Cochlear Implant
  • Z-2137-2019 · Oct 16, 2018 · Terminated
    MED EL Cochlear Implant System, SONATATIi100, sold under the following implant types: a. SONATAti100 FLEXsoft; b. SONATAti100 H Standard; c. SONATAti100 Standard
  • Z-2138-2019 · Oct 16, 2018 · Terminated
    MED EL Cochlear Implant System, PULSARci100 Standard - Product Usage: The PULSARci100 Implant is an implantable part of the MED EL Cochlear Implant System and can only be used toge
  • Z-2136-2019 · Oct 16, 2018 · Terminated
    MED EL Cochlear Implant System, Mi1000 MED EL CONCERTO, sold under the following implant types: a. Mil000 CONCERTO PIN +FLEX28; b. Mi1000 CONCERTO +FLEX28; c. Mi100

Other Implant, Cochlear devices

All Implant, Cochlear devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page