Skip to content

Vistafix 93100Recalls & reported problems

Cochlear Bone Anchored Solutions AB · Cochlear™ Vistafix® VXI300 Implant 3mm · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 09321502021715), received between Nov 22, 2017 and Feb 19, 2025 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 2 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem2
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Host-Tissue Reaction3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available2
  • Bacterial Infection2
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 19, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    PER THE CLINIC, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SKIN REVISION SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA (DATE NOT REPORTED) IN ORDER TO EXCISE THE SKIN AROUND THE ABUTMENT.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 21407552 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 19, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    PER THE CLINIC, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SKIN REVISION SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA (DATE NOT REPORTED) IN ORDER TO EXCISE THE SKIN AROUND THE ABUTMENT.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 21407520 ↗
  • InjuryJun 8, 2022Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    PER THE CLINIC, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A LOSS OF OSSEOINTEGRATION OF THE IMPLANT. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE ARE PLANS TO RE-IMPLANT THE PATIENT WITH ANOTHER DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 14640183 ↗
  • InjuryDec 5, 2017Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    PER THE CLINIC, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN INFECTION AND SKIN OVER-GROWTH AT THE IMPLANT SITE AND WAS SUBSEQUENTLY TREATED WITH AN ANTIBIOTIC OINTMENT. THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO BE CLINICALLY MANAGED BY THEIR HEALTHCARE PROVIDER. THE IMPLANTED DEVICE REMAINS INSITU.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Host-Tissue Reaction

    MAUDE report 7084499 ↗
  • InjuryNov 30, 2017Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    PER THE CLINIC, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN INFECTION AND SKIN OVER-GROWTH AT THE IMPLANT SITE AND WAS SUBSEQUENTLY TREATED WITH AN ANTIBIOTIC OINTMENT.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection; Host-Tissue Reaction

    MAUDE report 7073851 ↗
  • InjuryNov 22, 2017Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    PER THE CLINIC, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED SKIN OVERGROWTH AT ABUTMENT SITE; SUBSEQUENTLY THE PATIENT WAS PLACED UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA AND UNDERWENT SKIN REVISION SURGERY DURING AN ABUTMENT CHANGE. THE IMPLANTED DEVICE REMAINS.

    Patient problems: Host-Tissue Reaction

    MAUDE report 7055068 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, NOSE, INTERNAL devices

All PROSTHESIS, NOSE, INTERNAL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page