Jelco 3085Recalls & reported problems
Icu Medical, Inc. · GTIN for PROTECTIV PLUS-W SAFETY CATHETER-RADIOPAQUE 18G 1/EA · Class 2
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 6
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10351688071309), received between May 14, 2018 and Jul 10, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Positioning Failure” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Positioning Failure2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
- Material Fragmentation1
- Material Twisted/Bent1
- Protective Measures Problem1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Reaction, Injection Site1
Recent adverse event reports
The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJul 10, 2024Material Twisted/Bent; Protective Measures Problem; Material Twisted/Bent; Protective Measures Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WITH THE DEVICE WHEN TRYING TO START AN IV ON A PATIENT THAT THE DEVICE WAS BENT AND DID NOT DEPLOY. THERE WAS PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, AND NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19714993 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2023Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A "WRITER" WAS USED TO INITIATE AN IV. AN 18G NEEDLE WAS USED TO ATTEMPT THE LINE IN THE LEFT ANTECUBITAL (AC). UPON THREADING IV CANNULA, RESISTANCE FELT, FLASH OF BLOOD SEEN INITIALLY, BUT NOT DURING THREADING. THE "WRITER" ATTEMPTED TO PULL IV CANNULA OUT AS PATIENT COMPLAINING OF PAIN AND RESISTANCE TO THREADING FELT, BUT INCREASED RESISTANCE FELT BY WRITER WHEN ATTEMPTING TO PULL IV CANNULA OUT. AFTER INITIAL RESISTANCE, WRITER FELT SUDDEN RELEASE OF TENSION, AND IV CANNULA WAS REMOVED FROM PATIENT'S AC. ON INSPECTION OF IV CANNULA, CANNULA WAS NOTED TO BE SHORTER THAN NORMAL WHEN COMPARED TO INTACT IV CANNULA OF SAME GAGE AND END-PIECE NOTED TO BE JAGGED ON THE EDGE. THE PATIENT'S AC WAS FELT, NO BUMPS OR BRUISING NOTED, PATIENT REMAINED VITALLY STABLE THROUGHOUT, NOT COMPLAINING OF PAIN POST REMOVAL OF IV CATHETER. DRESSING AND PRESSURE APPLIED TO PATIENT'S LEFT AC MAINTAINED FOR 2 MINUTES POST REMOVAL OF IV CANNULA. PATIENT AWARE OF COMPLICATIONS ON IV ATTEMPT, DENIED QUESTIONS WHEN ASKED BY WRITER. THE END PIECE THAT BROKE OFF WAS NEVER LOCATED. THE PRIMARY NURSE AND OTHER USER PALPATED THE AREA AND WERE UNABLE TO LOCATE THE END-PIECE. THE EMERGENCY PH
Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque; Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 16879502 ↗InjuryNov 16, 2018Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Difficult or Delayed Positioning
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED THAT A SMITHS MEDICAL CATHETER HAD RESISTANCE UPON REMOVAL. HALF OF THE CATHETER WAS MISSING WHEN IT WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THIS PIECE WAS REMOVED THE FOLLOWING DAY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8081921 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2018Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED INDICATING THAT A SMITHS MEDICAL JELCO® PROTECTIV® SAFETY I.V. CATHETER DID NOT HAVE A SHARP RETRACT; SHARP DID NOT RETRACT AS NO MOVEMENT OCCURED. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7527385 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2018Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED INDICATING THAT A SMITHS MEDICAL JELCO® PROTECTIV® SAFETY I.V. CATHETER DID NOT HAVE A SHARP RETRACT; SHARP DID NOT RETRACT. THERE WERE NO REPORTED ADVERSE EFFECTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7527304 ↗InjuryMay 14, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A JELCO® PROTECTIV® SAFETY I.V. CATHETER HAS BEEN SET ON THE (B)(6) 2017 ON A PATIENT BY A NURSE. ON THE MORNING OF THE (B)(6) 2017, A LYMPHANGITIS APPEARED IN PATIENT'S ARM BEFORE THE CORONOGRAPHY TEST.
Patient problems: Reaction, Injection Site
MAUDE report 7511355 ↗
Other Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days devices
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382523Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days660 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382533Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls527 reports
- BD PosiFlush 306546Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 death608 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard Shielded IV Catheter 381823Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter, intravascular, therapeutic, short-term less than 30 days582 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 381423Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 recall528 reports
- BD Insyte Autoguard 382544Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days1 recall437 reports
- BD Nexiva, BD Q-Syte 383536Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls374 reports
- BD PosiFlush 306547Becton, Dickinson And Company · Catheter,intravascular,therapeutic,short-term less than 30 days2 recalls1 death331 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page