NA 1018-13-000Recalls & reported problems
Depuy (Ireland) · FEMORAL HEAD 14/16 TAPER +5 Diameter 28mm · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 15
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 15
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 15 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295001348), received between Jan 9, 2018 and Oct 25, 2023 — classified as 15 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem8
- Insufficient Device Problem Information4
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
Patient problems
- Pain8
- No Code Available4
- Joint Dislocation3
- Not Applicable2
- Discomfort1
- Foreign Body Reaction1
- Loss of Range of Motion1
- Osteolysis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 15 most recent of 15 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 25, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON SAID PATIENT WOULD BENEFIT FROM A WASHOUT OF THEIR HIP AS THE HIP WAS SHOWING SIGNS OF INFECTION. CULTURES CAME BACK NEGATIVE, BUT THE SURGEON PROCEEDED TO WASHOUT THE HIP AND EXCHANGE THE FEMORAL HEAD. NEW HEAD WAS OPENED AND IMPLANTED, HIP WAS REDUCED AND CLOSING PROCESS BEGAN. NO ADVERSE EVENTS. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6), 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18004220 ↗InjuryOct 3, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 17861896 ↗InjuryNov 29, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2022, AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 15877470 ↗InjurySep 20, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
SUBJECT ID: (B)(6). STUDY: (B)(6). CLINICAL NOTIFICATION RECEIVED FOR REVISION OF LEFT TOTAL HIP TO ADDRESS POLYETHYLENE LINER WEAR. DATE OF PRIMARY: (B)(6) 1983 (MANUFACTURER UNKNOWN). DATE OF REVISION #1: (B)(6) 1997. DATE OF REVISION #2: (B)(6) 2020. (RIGHT HIP). TREATMENT: FEMORAL HEAD AND ACETABULAR LINER REVISED.
Patient problems: Discomfort; Loss of Range of Motion; Pain; Synovitis
MAUDE report 12500584 ↗InjurySep 8, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
COMPASS CASE (B)(4) REPORT: REVISION WAS DONE FOR POLY WEAR, DISLOCATION. LOOSENING INTERFACE: NON-CEMENTED.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 12440803 ↗InjuryOct 28, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INSTABILITY. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2020. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10749634 ↗InjurySep 29, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. NO LOOSENING WAS NOTED. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2020, RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain
MAUDE report 10601852 ↗InjuryAug 2, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENTS CHIEF COMPLAINT WAS PAIN. THE SURGEON WENT IN AND FOUND THE POLY TO BE WORN. HE REPLACED THE HEAD AND POLY. KEEP IN MIND ALTHOUGH THE DATE ABOVE WAS GIVEN, THIS IS THOUGHT TO BE THE LAST TIME THIS PATIENT WAS REVISED. IT IS UNKNOWN. THE CUP AND STEM IS AN OLD GENERATION PRODUCT, SO IT COULD NOT HAVE BEEN HER PRIMARY SURGERY DATE. THE STEM AND CUP WERE WELL FIXED THIS IS WHY THE SURGEON CHOOSE A HEAD AND LINER REPLACEMENT WAS BEST. DOI: (B)(6) 2009. DOR: (B)(6) 2019, LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain
MAUDE report 8856999 ↗InjuryMay 7, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO POLY WEAR AND OSTEOLYSIS. A NEW POLY AND HEAD WERE IMPLANTED. DOI: (B)(6) 1997. DOR: (B)(6) 2019; LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Osteolysis
MAUDE report 8588193 ↗InjurySep 13, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAS A RIGHT TOTAL HIP WITH AML STEM AND DURALOC CUP. THE PATIENT HAD A CONSTRAINED LINER IMPLANTED IN APRIL AND HAS DISLOCATED. THE RING TO THE LINER WAS OVER THE NECK OF THE STEM. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO REMOVE THE CUP AND IMPLANT ANOTHER WITH BETTER VERSION. THE STEM WAS RETAINED AND IS WELL FIXED. DOI: (B)(6) 2018; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 7872419 ↗InjuryAug 17, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN. DOI: (B)(6) 1992; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; UNKNOWN HIP.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 7794504 ↗InjuryMay 8, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
DER STATES THAT THE PATIENT HAD IMPLANTED BIPOLAR EXPERIENCING PAINFUL HIP. PATIENT WAS CONVERTED INTO TOTAL HIP. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; UNKNOWN SIDE.
Patient problems: Not Applicable; Pain
MAUDE report 7493784 ↗InjuryApr 3, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
DER STATES THAT THE PATIENT'S HIP REVISED DUE TO PAIN. A NEW DURALOC POLY 28X48 NEUTRAL WAS CEMENTED INTO THE ACETABULAR SHELL DUE TO SOME METAL WEAR ON THE INSIDE OF CUP. CUP WAS WELL FIXED THOUGH SURGEON FELT PRIOR CUP LOCKING MECHANISM MAY HAVE BEEN COMPROMISED DUE TO THE METAL WEAR ON THE INSIDE OF THE CUP. UNKNOWN HOW METAL WEAR OCCURRED. DOI: (B)(6) 2017; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Not Applicable; Pain
MAUDE report 7391762 ↗InjuryFeb 19, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS DISLOCATION. LINER, RING AND HEAD WERE REPLACED. DOI: 1998 ; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 7280018 ↗InjuryJan 9, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS METALLOSIS DUE TO BROKEN LOCKING RING, WORN AND LOOSE POLY LINER. DOI: (B)(6) 1998; DOR: (B)(6) 2017; LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction
MAUDE report 7174979 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented devices
- NA 1365-51-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented753 reports
- NA 1365-50-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented412 reports
- ARTICUL/EZE 1365-21-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented1 recall280 reports
- ARTICUL/EZE 1365-11-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented1 death262 reports
- LFIT 6260-9-236Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented256 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented2 deaths239 reports
- ELEOS™ 25002111EOnkos Surgical, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented3 deaths230 reports
- Novation 130-36-52Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented2 recalls124 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page