PINNACLE 1217-06-070Recalls & reported problems
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE HIP SOLUTIONS REVISION POROCOAT ACETABULAR SHELL STANDARD 70mm OD 64mm LINER · Class 2 · Implant
All models of PINNACLE (182)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10603295008811), received between Apr 5, 2024 and Apr 5, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body Reaction1
- Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
- Inflammation1
- Osteolysis1
- Pain1
- Swelling/ Edema1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryApr 5, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
MEDICAL RECORDS RECEIVED. DOI: (B)(6) 2007: MALE PATIENT WITH A HISTORY OF LEFT HIP FEMORAL FRACTURE, LEFT HIP COMPETITOR ORIF, LEFT HIP COMPETITOR THA, ACETABULAR AND FEMORAL OSTEOLYSIS, AND CHRONIC SEPSIS INFECTION RECEIVED A DEPUY MOM REVISION THA AS STAGE 2 TREATMENT OF INFECTION. THE ACETABULAR CUP WAS SECURED WITH A DOME SCREW AND THE ACETABULAR OSTEOLYSIS REQUIRED BONE GRAFTING. THE PREVIOUS FEMORAL FRACTURE SITE WAS PARTIALLY HEALED AND REQUIRED A LARGER BONE CUT AND THE USE OF AN S-ROM STEM AND SLEEVE. THE SURGEONS NOTED THERE WAS SOME SHORTENING OF THE LEFT LEG BECAUSE OF THE PREEXISTING FRACTURE CAUSED BY AN MVA. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS. CT SCAN AND PREOPERATIVE TESTING (B)(6) 2024: A MALE PATIENT IS REFERRED FOR REVISION SURGERY AFTER FAILED ATTEMPTS AT TREATING CHRONIC LEFT HIP PAIN. PREOPERATIVE ASPIRATION DOES NOT DETECT ELEVATED SERUM OR SYNOVIAL HEAVY METAL IONS BUT DOES DETECT ELEVATED INFLAMMATORY MARKERS. CT SCANS IDENTIFY A LARGE PSEUDOTUMOR AS WELL AS EXTENSIVE ACETABULAR AND FEMORAL OSTEOLYSIS. THESE WERE PREEXISTING EVENTS AND ARE PART OF THE TREATMENT OF REVISION CAPTURED ON (B)(4).
Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; Inflammation; Osteolysis; Pain; Swelling/ Edema
MAUDE report 19051365 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices
- PINNACLE 1217-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED735 reports
- NA 1365-52-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED683 reports
- APEX 1246-03-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED3 deaths613 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-20-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED2 deaths590 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED1 death484 reports
- NA 1365-53-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED404 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED388 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-32-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED386 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page