Skip to content

PINNACLE 1217-07-064Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE HIP SOLUTIONS REVISION POROCOAT (DPX) ACETABULAR SHELL DEEP PROFILE 64mm OD 58mm LINER · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PINNACLE (182)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295008927), received between Sep 12, 2018 and Dec 14, 2018 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Discomfort1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Pain1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 14, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ALLEGED INFECTION AFTER FIRST REVISION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8164194 ↗
  • InjurySep 12, 2018Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    NEW UNITY RECORD CREATED IN ORDER TO UPDATE LEGACY COMPLAINT NUMBER (B)(4). LITIGATION PAPERS ALLEGE FOLLOWING HIS SURGERY, PATIENT BEGAN SUFFERING FROM PAIN AND DISCOMFORT IN HIS HIP. DOI: (B)(6) 2007 - DOR: (B)(6) 2009 (RIGHT HIP). PATIENT IS A RESIDENT OF (B)(6). UPDATE AD (B)(6) 2018: (B)(4) HAS BEEN REOPENED UNDER (B)(4) DUE TO RECEIPT OF PPF AND STICKER SHEETS.  IN ADDITION TO WHAT WERE PREVIOUSLY ALLEGED, PPF ALLEGES LOOSENING OF THE CUP AND FRACTURE OF A COMPONENT. THE STEM WAS ADDED TO THE IMPACTED PRODUCT AS IT WAS REMOVED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY. PART/LOT NUMBERS AND PATIENT INFORMATION WERE PROVIDED IN THE PPF. DOI: (B)(6) 2007 - DOR: (B)(6) 2009 (RIGHT HIP).

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 7867990 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page