Skip to content

PINNACLE 1217-11-058Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE HIP SOLUTIONS DUOFIX HA ACETABULAR SHELL 100 SERIES 58mm OD · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PINNACLE (182)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295009092), received between May 31, 2018 and Jun 28, 2019 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Not Applicable1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 28, 2019Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION FROM ETQ: 1217-11-058 X1 PINNACLE ACETABULAR SHELL 100 SERIES (LOT: 311131) WAS IMPLANTED AS PER SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. SUBSEQUENTLY, SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO SCREW IN (1246-03-000) APEX HOLE ELIMINATOR (LOT: D13033399) INTO ACETABULAR SHELL. HOWEVER, THE APEX HOLE ELIMINATOR COULD NOT SCREW INTO THREADS OF ACETABULAR SHELL. THEREFORE, A SECOND APEX HOLE ELIMINATOR (LOT: D13050493) WAS OPENED. THIS TOO COULD NOT BE IMPLANTED. THE SURGEON THEN SAID, ALTHOUGH HE HAD NEVER HAD THIS ISSUE IN HIS MULTIPLE PRIOR CASES, THE THREADS OF THE ACETABULAR SHELL MUST HAVE BEEN BURRED. THE SURGEON DECIDED TO NOT WORRY ABOUT USING A HOLE ELIMINATOR AND SUBSEQUENTLY IMPLANTED A SHELL LINER, AS PER SURGICAL TECHNIQUE. THE OPERATION WAS COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER PROBLEMS.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 8746153 ↗
  • InjuryMay 31, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS INFECTION. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; UNKNOWN SIDE.

    Patient problems: Not Applicable; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7556356 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page