Skip to content

PINNACLE 1217-55-500Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE CANCELLOUS BONE SCREW 6.5mm x 55mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PINNACLE (182)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
12
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
11
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295010425), received between Nov 16, 2017 and Mar 25, 2025 — classified as 11 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
  • Loss of Osseointegration3
  • Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Migration1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection5
  • Pain4
  • Discomfort3
  • Inadequate Osseointegration3
  • Inflammation3
  • No Code Available3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Bone Fracture(s)1

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT BECAME INFECTED. ALL COMPONENTS (EXCEPT CUP) WERE REMOVED AND NEW IMPLANTS WERE INSERTED AFTER IRRIGATION. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 21687097 ↗
  • InjuryAug 21, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT A RIGHT HIP REVISION DUE TO AN INFECTION. PRODUCTS WERE EXPLANTED AND A SPACER WAS PUT IN. SURGICAL DELAY IS UNKNOWN. DOI- (B)(6) 2023, DOR- (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17584191 ↗
  • MalfunctionAug 5, 2022Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping; Device Contaminated During Manufacture or Shipping

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PACKAGE WAS NOT SEALED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15174941 ↗
  • InjuryOct 18, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Osseointegration Problem; Migration

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS MIGRATION AND LOOSENING OF THE CUP AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. CANCER PATIENT. CONVERTED TO TRI-FLANGE. PROXIMAL FEMUR AND SEGMENT REMOVED TO RE-ESTABLISH LEG LENGTH. DOI: (B)(6) 2018, DOR: (B)(6) 2021, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 12646625 ↗
  • InjuryAug 25, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. DOI: (B)(6) 2021, DOR: (B)(6) 2021, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 12367007 ↗
  • InjuryApr 9, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    LITIGATION ALLEGES LOOSENING OF CUP. DOI: (B)(6) 2007; DOR: (B)(6) 2011, (LEFT HIP).

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Inadequate Osseointegration; Inflammation; No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 8495129 ↗
  • InjuryApr 9, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    LITIGATION ALLEGES LOOSENING OF CUP. DOI: (B)(6) 2007; DOR: (B)(6) 2011, (LEFT HIP).

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Inadequate Osseointegration; Inflammation; No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 8495122 ↗
  • InjuryMar 21, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    UPDATE AD 17 JUL 2018: PPF ALLEGES ELEVATED METAL IONS. AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS, IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8439297 ↗
  • InjuryJan 29, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    LITIGATION ALLEGES THAT THE PATIENT SUFFERS FROM PAIN, DISCOMFORT, INFLAMMATION, AND LARGE AMOUNTS OF TOXIC COBALT CHROMIUM METAL ION PARTICLES TO BE RELEASED INTO THE BLOOD, TISSUE, AND BONE. UPDATE REC¿D 3/27/2014 - PFS WAS RECEIVED FROM LEGAL, PRIMARY MEDICAL RECORDS WERE RECEIVED FROM LEGAL, AND PART/LOT INFORMATION WAS IDENTIFIED. UPDATE AD 14 JAN 2019: (B)(4) HAS BEEN RE-OPENED UNDER (B)(4) DUE TO THE RECEIPT OF PPF AND STICKER SHEETS RECORD. IN ADDITION TO WHAT WERE PREVIOUSLY ALLEGED, PPF ALLEGES INFECTION REQUIRING IV ANTIBIOTICS.

    Patient problems: Discomfort; Inflammation; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8284880 ↗
  • InjuryDec 14, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ALLEGED INFECTION AFTER FIRST REVISION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8164239 ↗
  • InjuryJun 29, 2018Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    DER STATES THAT THE ORIGINAL IMPLANT DATE WAS UNKNOWN. THIS PATIENT HAD HER HIP REVISED WHERE A COMPETITOR HIP REPLACEMENT STEM WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SUMMIT STEM AND PINNACLE CUP AT (B)(6). THE PATIENT CAME INTO THE ER AT (B)(6) HOSPITAL WITH IN 2 WEEKS OF HER REVISION SURGERY COMPLAINING OF HIP PAIN. X-RAYS INDICATES THAT HER ACETABULAR CUP HAD MOST LIKELY CAME LOOSE AND PROTRUDED THROUGH THE MEDIAL ACETABULAR WALL. THE LOOSENING WAS ALLEGEDLY BONE TO CEMENT INTERFACE WITH COMPETITOR CEMENT HAVING BEEN USED. SHE WAS CONSULTED WHERE IT WAS DECIDED THAT HE WOULD EXPLANTED ALL COMPONENTS AND LET THE PELVIS TRY AND HEAL AND RECONSTITUTE BONE. ALL IMPLANTS WERE EXPLANTED. THE PATIENT HAS OBTAINED LEGAL REPRESENTATION SO INFORMATION AVAILABLE IS LIMITED. DOI: (B)(6) 2018; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Pain

    MAUDE report 7650848 ↗
  • InjuryNov 16, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Loss of Osseointegration; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Loss of Osseointegration

    REVISION DUE TO ACETABULAR COMPONENT MIGRATING MEDIALLY, RESULTING IN PELVIC DISASSOCIATION, REQUIRING A 2 STAGE REVISION PROCEDURE CARRIED OUT IN (B)(6) 2009.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7036653 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page