CERAMAX 1218-87-654Recalls & reported problems
Depuy (Ireland) · CERAMAX Ceramic Insert NEUTRAL 54mm OD 36mm ID · Class 3 · Implant
All models of CERAMAX (8)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 19
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 10
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 19 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295012528), received between Aug 23, 2017 and Mar 6, 2026 — classified as 10 injuries, 9 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (14 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture14
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Difficult to Remove1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
Patient problems
- No Code Available5
- Pain4
- Insufficient Information3
- Joint Dislocation3
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Information2
- Unspecified Infection2
Recent adverse event reports
The 19 most recent of 19 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 6, 2026Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CERAMIC LINER WAS IMPACTED INTO ACETABULAR SHELL, CRACKED INSIDE THE SHELL. A FEW FRAGMENTS WERE REMOVED. DOCTOR REPORTED THE LINER WAS STILL WELL SEATED AND LEFT IT IN PLACE. DOE: (B)(6) 2026. LEFT SIDE.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24534639 ↗MalfunctionJul 5, 2022Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING INSERTION OF THE CERAMIC LINER, THE SURGEON BROKE THE IMPLANT AND HAD TO RESORT TO ANOTHER TYPE OF LINER. THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY OF 15 MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14914388 ↗MalfunctionJun 17, 2022Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN IMPLANTING THE CERAMAX LINER THE DOCTOR NOTICED A SMALL CRACK AFTER HE IMPACTED INTO THE SHELL. HE REMOVED THE CRACKED CERAMAX LINER AND USED AN ALTRX LINER INSTEAD. DOE: (B)(6) 2022. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14734795 ↗MalfunctionMar 15, 2022Fracture; Fracture
THE RIM OF THE CERAMIC LINER FRACTURED DURING INSERTION. LINER WAS REMOVED AND A NEW CERAMIC LINER WAS INSERTED. SURGICAL DELAY OF 10 MINUTES OCCURRED. NO ADVERSE AFFECTS ON THE PATIENT. DOE: (B)(6) 2022. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13765915 ↗InjuryMay 17, 2021Fracture; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Fracture; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON SAID HE WAS UNSURE IF THE LINER WAS DISASSOCIATED INTRAOPERATIVELY OR BECAME DISASSOCIATED POSTOPERATIVELY. THE SURGEON SAID THE PATIENT WANTED HIS HIP REVISED BECAUSE OF PAIN AND LACK OF MOTION. THE SURGEON EXPLAINED A 54X36 CERAMAX LINER. THE SURGEON SAID THE LINER WAS FRACTURED. THE SURGEON TRIALED A 54X36 +4 10 DEGREE AND A 36 X+8.5 CERAMIC BIOLOGY TS CERAMIC HEAD AND THE SURGEON SAID HIP STABILITY AND LEG LENGTH WERE ACCEPTABLE. THE SURGEON ASKED THE NURSE TO OPEN THE SAME IMPLANTS MATCHING THE TRIALS THAT WERE USED. THE HOSPITAL TOOK POSSESSION OF ALL EXPLANTED ITEMS. THE SURGEON SAID THAT HE FEELS THE BROKEN PIECES WERE RETRIEVED FROM THE PATIENT. DOI: (B)(6) 2016 DOR: (B)(6) 2021 AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available; Loss of Range of Motion; Pain
MAUDE report 11836536 ↗InjuryDec 16, 2020Fracture; Difficult to Remove; Fracture; Difficult to Remove
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED INDICATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING PAIN THAT LED TO THE REVISION SURGERY. AFFECTED SIDE IF LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Pain
MAUDE report 11021022 ↗InjuryDec 11, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
SUBJECT ID: (B)(6). STUDY: (B)(6). CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR ILIOPSOAS BURSITIS OF LEFT (STUDY) HIP EVENT IS NOT SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED MODERATE EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO DEVICE AND IS RELATED TO PROCEDURE. DATE OF IMPLANTATION: (B)(6) 2017. DATE OF EVENT (ONSET): (B)(6) 2019 (LEFT HIP). TREATMENT: INJECTION INTO ILIOPSOAS BURSA. PRODUCT DETAILS: COMPONENT: SUMMIT STEM POROCOAT STD OFFSET SZ 6, CATALOG NUMBER: 157001120, LOT NUMBER ID: H33727. COMPONENT: CERAMAX CERAMIC INSERT NEUTRAL 54MM OD 36MM ID, CATALOG NUMBER: 121887654, LOT NUMBER ID: 849743. COMPONENT: PINNACLE SHELL SECTOR 54MM, CATALOG NUMBER: 121722054, LOT NUMBER ID: HC0470. COMPONENT: BIOLOX DELTA FEMORAL HEAD CERAMIC 36MM +8.5, CATALOG NUMBER: 136536330, LOT NUMBER ID: 8550546. COMPONENT: CANCELLOUS BONE SCREW 35MM, CATALOG NUMBER: 121735500, LOT NUMBER ID: D16091490.
Patient problems: Pain; Skin Irritation
MAUDE report 9451203 ↗InjuryDec 6, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR WOUND, OPEN, BUTTOCK WITH COMPLICATION, LEFT, SEQUELA EVENT IS SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED MODERATE - POORLY TOLERATED, SUSTAINED AND INTERFERES WITH NORMAL ACTIVITY AND REQUIRES MEDICAL ATTENTION. EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO DEVICE AND IS RELATED TO PROCEDURE. DATE OF IMPLANTATION: (B)(6) 2017. DATE OF EVENT (ONSET): (B)(6) 2017. (LEFT HIP).
Patient problems: Abscess; Hematoma; Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; No Code Available; Pain
MAUDE report 9424698 ↗InjuryOct 15, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PPF AND MEDICAL RECORD RECEIVED. PPF ALLEGES DISLOCATION AND INFECTION. DOI: (B)(6) 2007, (STEM AND CUP). DOI: (B)(6) 2015, (HEAD AND LINER). DOR: (B)(6) 2016, LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 9191981 ↗InjuryOct 15, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PPF AND MEDICAL RECORD RECEIVED. PPF ALLEGES OPEN AND CLOSED DISLOCATION AND INFECTION AFTER THE FIRST REVISION. DOI: (B)(6) 2007 (STEM AND CUP); DOI: (B)(6) 2014 (HEAD AND LINER); DOR: NONE REPORTED; RIGHT HP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 9191466 ↗MalfunctionMar 18, 2019Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON WAS INSTALLING A CERAMAX LINER USING INSTEROR HANDLE AS SURGEON IMPACTED THE LINER CHIPPED ON RIM. SURGICAL DELAY OF 10 MINUTES.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8428542 ↗MalfunctionJan 23, 2019Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON WAS REPLACING THIS PATIENT¿S RIGHT HIP WITH THE PLAN TO USE CERAMIC PINNACLE LINER. WHEN THE SURGEON WENT TO SEAT THE LINER, WHICH WAS IN A CORRECT POSITION, THE LINER CRACKED INTO MULTIPLE PIECES. THE LINER AND IT¿S DEBRIS WERE REMOVED ALONG WITH THE CUP.
Patient problems: Not Applicable
MAUDE report 8270169 ↗InjuryJan 15, 2019Fracture; Fracture
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO BROKEN CERAMIC LINER. FEMORAL HEAD, CERAMIC LINER AND STEM WERE REPLACED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8249896 ↗InjuryOct 30, 2018Fracture; Fracture
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS THE BROKEN LINER.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8019020 ↗MalfunctionMay 9, 2018Fracture; Fracture
DER STATES CERAMIC LINER BROKE WHEN IMPACTED DURING SURGERY. DOE: (B)(6) 2018; UNKNOWN HIP.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7498555 ↗MalfunctionApr 26, 2018Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE CERAMIC LINER BROKE WHEN IMPACTED DURING SURGERY. DOE: (B)(6) 2018; LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7463867 ↗InjuryDec 14, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS DISLOCATION. THE LINER ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT WAS NOT REVISED. DOI: (B)(6) 2017; DOR: (B)(6) 2017 LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 7118432 ↗InjuryAug 30, 2017Fracture; Fracture
PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO FRACTURE OF THE CERAMIC LINER.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6831960 ↗MalfunctionAug 23, 2017Fracture; Fracture
DER STATES THAT THE CERAMIC LINER WOULDN'T SIT PROPERLY IN THE SIZE 54 CUP, SURGEON TRIAL SEVERAL TIMES TO REPOSITION IT AND SEAT IT BUT THE LINER WOULDN'T SEAT. A 22 LINER WAS TRIED AND THE RIM OF THE LINER CHIPPED OFF UPON IMPACTION. THE SURGEON FEELS THERE IS AN ISSUE WITH THE CUP THAT WOULDN'T ALLOW LINER TO SEAT.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6813421 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented839 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented643 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented335 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented263 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-330Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented255 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented253 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-056Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented220 reports
- SUMMIT POROCOAT 1570-11-120Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented1 death204 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page