Skip to content

PINNACLE 1219-32-448Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE HIP SOLUTIONS MARATHON POLYETHYLENE ACETABULAR LINER +4 NEUTRAL 32mm ID 48mm OD · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PINNACLE (182)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
17
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
17
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 17 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295014317), received between Aug 18, 2017 and Jun 11, 2026 — classified as 17 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (12 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 2 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 1 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated12
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Disassembly2
  • Fracture1
  • Naturally Worn1
  • Noise, Audible1

Patient problems

  • Joint Dislocation12
  • No Code Available4
  • Joint Laxity2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Information1
  • Not Applicable1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 17 most recent of 17 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 11, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD DISLOCATING THA. REVISED TO +4 10° LINER AND LONGER HEAD. AFFECTED SIDE- RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 25472069 ↗
  • InjuryJan 13, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS DISLOCATING AND LINER WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A CONSTRAINED LINER. THERE WAS NO LOSS OF TIME. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 21143955 ↗
  • InjuryNov 8, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2024. THE STEM, HEADBALL AND LINER WAS REPLACED DUE TO INSTABILITY. THE RESULT OF INSTABILITY IS UNKNOWN. SURGICAL DELAY WAS UNKNOWN. DATE OF IMPLANT WAS (B)(6) 2023.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 20637055 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED STEM/HEADBALL AND LINER DUE TO INSTABILITY AND RESULT OF INSTABILITY IS UNKNOWN. SURGICAL DELAY WAS UNKNOWN. DOI: (B)(6) 2023. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 20632612 ↗
  • InjuryJul 25, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    FIRST REVISION ON (B)(6) 2024 WITH CHANGE TO A DYSPLASIA INLAY AND A MERETE CERAMIC HEAD 32 MM WITH HEAD CONE ADAPTER 2 XL 7.5 DEGREES.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 19825403 ↗
  • InjuryDec 15, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    CHRONIC DISLOCATIONS. CONVERTED TO CONSTRAINED LINER. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE. DOI: (B)(6) 2017. DOR: (B)(6) 2021. LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 13014028 ↗
  • InjuryJun 8, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO CHRONIC DISLOCATION. DOI: (B)(6) 2020, DOR: (B)(6) 2020, RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 10130539 ↗
  • InjuryNov 7, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS CHRONIC DISLOCATION. DOI: (B)(6) 2016; DOR: (B)(6) 2019; RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9290117 ↗
  • InjuryJun 3, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A PRIMARY RIGHT THR ON (B)(6) 2012. PATIENT DID WELL UNTIL A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, WHEN SHE FELL AND DISLOCATED. THE SURGEON RELOCATED HER RIGHT HIP BUT FELL AGAIN RECENTLY, DISLOCATING THE RIGHT HIP AGAIN. THE STEM AND CUP ARE WELL FIXED. THE CUP ORIENTATION AND INCLINATION IS GOOD. THE SURGEON DETERMINED THE BEST OPTION WAS RE-OPERATION USING A CONSTRAINED LINER. HE DID SO ON (B)(6) 2019. DOI: (B)(6) 2012; DOR: (B)(6) 2019, RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8664986 ↗
  • InjuryApr 16, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    PFS ALLEGES PAIN, MOVEMENT DIFFICULTY AND IMPAIRED SEXUAL ACTIVITY.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Joint Dislocation; Pain

    MAUDE report 8518318 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2019Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    PINNACLE POLY ON CERAMIC LITIGATION RECORDS RECEIVED. LITIGATION ALLEGES CORROSION AND FRICTION WEAR CAUSED LARGE AMOUNTS OF TOXIC METAL IONS AND PARTICLES RELEASE INTO BLOOD, TISSUE AND BONE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8310829 ↗
  • InjuryAug 1, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    PINNACLE PPF AND MEDICAL RECORDS RECEIVED. PPF ALLEGES COMPONENT FRACTURE, DISLOCATION WITH CLOSED REDUCTION AND INFECTION. THERE IS NO REVISION REPORTED AT THIS TIME. DOI: (B)(6) 2011; DOR: NOT REPORTED; RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7738652 ↗
  • InjuryAug 1, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    PINNACLE PPF AND MEDICAL RECORDS RECEIVED. PPF ALLEGES DISLOCATION. AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS DISLOCATION OF LEFT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT. OPERATIVE FINDINGS STATES THAT DISLOCATION OCCURRED WITH EXTREME FLEXION AND INTERNAL ROTATION. REVISION NOTES REPORTED THAT IT WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO REDUCE THE HIP, THERE WAS A DEFORMITY OF THE SOCKET RIM, A LARGE AMOUNT OF BLOOD STAINED FLUID WHICH EMITTED FROM THE JOINT AND THERE WERE NO SIGNS OF INFECTION. DOI: (B)(4) 2015; DOR: (B)(6) 2015; LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Not Applicable

    MAUDE report 7738618 ↗
  • InjuryDec 7, 2017Disassembly; Fracture; Disassembly; Fracture

    DER STATES THAT THE LINER WAS BROKEN AND THE HEAD HAD WORN TO THE METAL CUP. LINER WAS ALSO LOOSE FROM THE CUP.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7095691 ↗
  • InjuryNov 2, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS DISLOCATION.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 6998092 ↗
  • InjuryOct 23, 2017Disassembly; Noise, Audible; Disassembly; Noise, Audible

    IT STATES THAT THE PINNACLE HIP ACETABULAR COMPONENT REVISED DUE TO POLY LINER DISASSOCIATION. ALSO, OPERATED HIP WORKED FINE UNTIL (B)(6) 2017, WHEN UNEXPECTEDLY IT BEGAN TO SQUEAK LOUDLY AS A DRY DOOR HINGE. THE VOICE WAS CLEARLY AUDIBLE TO OUTSIDERS TOO. THE NEXT DAY, THE HIP STARTED TO BOTHER AND LOCKED UP SO THAT THE KNEE COULD NOT BE RAISED TO 90 DEGREES. ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON TOLD DURING THE SURGERY THAT THE ARTIFICIAL HIP WAS IMPLANTED CORRECTLY. HE COULD NOT EVEN SAY WHY IT WAS BROKEN. OVERWEIGHT SHOULD NOT BE A CAUSE FOR BREAK BECAUSE MY SISTER HAS THE SAME ARTIFICIAL JOINTS IN BOTH HIPS AND IS CONSIDERABLY MORE OVERWEIGHT THAN ME. SHE HAS HAD NO PROBLEMS AND THEY HAVE BEEN SEVERAL YEARS, ANOTHER SIX YEARS AND THE OTHER FOUR.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6968585 ↗
  • InjuryAug 18, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION: THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS CHRONIC DISLOCATION AND INSTABILITY.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 6803925 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page