Skip to content

DURALOC 1220-28-054Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Duraloc MARATHON ACETABULAR LINER Neutral 28mm ID 54mm OD · Class 2 · Implant

All models of DURALOC (93)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295015086), received between May 3, 2021 and Jan 13, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 13, 2026Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON IS ORDERING A PATIENT SPECIFIC HIP-INLAY FOR A PLANNED REVISION BECAUSE OF NORMAL AND EXPECTED PE-WEAR ON AN UNKNOWN SIDE. THERE HAS BEEN NO ALLEGATION OF ANY PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. THE REVISION WILL TAKE PLACE IN ABOUT THREE TO SIX MONTHS. DOI: >10 YRS AGO.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24058822 ↗
  • InjuryJan 6, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO HIP PAIN / POLY WEAR. HEAD, LINER, AND LOCKING RING EXCHANGED. ORIGINAL DATE OF SURGERY UNKNOWN. BELIEVED TO BE ABOUT 15 YEARS AGO. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: ON (B)(6) 2022. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 16111839 ↗
  • InjuryMay 3, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS HIP DISLOCATION. NEW HEAD AND LINER. DOI: UNKNOWN DOR: (B)(6) 2021 AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 11765311 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page