Skip to content

DURALOC 1220-28-062Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Duraloc MARATHON ACETABULAR LINER Neutral 28mm ID 62 or 74mm OD · Class 2 · Implant

All models of DURALOC (93)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10603295015123), received between Aug 15, 2024 and Aug 15, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 15, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DOCTOR WAS UNSURE OF WHEN THE PATIENT HAD THEIR ORIGINAL SURGERY DONE. HE ALSO WASN¿T SURE WHO THE ORIGINAL SURGEON WAS OR WHERE IT HAD BEEN PERFORMED. BASED ON THE X-RAY, WE WERE ABLE TO IDENTIFY THE IMPLANT AS AN AML STEM AND DURALOC CUP. THE DOCTOR REVISED THE HIP DUE TO POLY WEAR. THE OLD FEMORAL HEAD AND LINER WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW IMPLANTS. THE HIP WAS THEN REDUCED, AND STABILITY WAS CONFIRMED. NO DELAYS OR ADVERSE EVENTS TOOK PLACE. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 19991163 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page