DURALOC 1220-28-154Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 17 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295015185), received between Aug 29, 2017 and Mar 9, 2026 — classified as 15 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (13 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 17 most recent of 17 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryMar 9, 2026Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED POLYETHYLENE WEAR OF THE LEFT SIDE INLAY FOLLOWING HIP SURGERY. AS A RESULT, THE PATIENT REQUIRED A REVISION SURGERY.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 24547562 ↗
• InjuryMar 6, 2026Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THE LEFT INLAY WAS WORN OUT.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 24533314 ↗
• InjuryJan 28, 2026Naturally Worn

  PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INLAY WEARING; REVISION SURGERY IS REQUIRED. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: UNKNOWN. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 24201843 ↗
• InjuryOct 28, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS WORN OUT DURALOC MARATHON HIP IMPLANT-RIGHT SIDE. REVISION SURGERY IS NEEDED.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 23406383 ↗
• InjurySep 4, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED AND POLY WEAR. SURGICAL DELAY WAS UNKNOWN. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2024, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 20135871 ↗
• InjuryJul 7, 2022Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN AND POLY WAS WEAR, HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE PERFORMED. ALL COMPONENTS WELL FIXED. DOI: (B)(6) 1993. DOR: (B)(6) 2022. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 14945278 ↗
• InjuryMay 18, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT REVISION OF ACETABULAR LINER AND FEMORAL HEAD DUE TO PAIN. REVISED TO A 36MM X 54 +4/10 DEGREE DURALOC POLY AND LARGE TAPER 36MM +11 HEADBALL. NO FURTHER INFORMATION AVAILABLE. DOI: UNKNOWN DOR: (B)(6) 2021 LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 11841699 ↗
• InjuryAug 13, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  REVISION SURGERY; (B)(6) 2020; (B)(6) HOSPITAL. REASON FOR REVISION WAS TO REPLACE A LIPPED DURALOC LINER WITH A CONSTRAINED DURALOC LINER DUE TO DISLOCATION.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

  MAUDE report 10401272 ↗
• InjuryAug 7, 2020Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  THE PATIENT WAS HIP REVISED FOR POLYETHYLENE WEAR. REPLACED LINER AND HEAD. DOI: (B)(6) 1998. DOR: (B)(6) 2020; LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 10379018 ↗
• MalfunctionJul 22, 2020Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

  SURGEON WAS PROCEEDING A HIP REVISION SURGERY AND THE ACETABULAR LINER WAS NEEDED TO BE CHANGED. A NEW ONE (SAME SIZE AND REFERENCE) WAS OPENED BUT NOT ABLE TO BE IMPACTED. SURGEON TRIED TO IMPACT THE ACETABULAR LINER, HOWEVER, THERE WAS STILL A BIT LOOSE AND IT WAS NOT SAFE FOR THE PATIENT. THERE WAS A CONSTRAINED LINER AVAILABLE SO WE OPENED IT AND IT WAS IMPACTED FIRMLY AND SAFELY.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 10308824 ↗
• InjuryJun 29, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN. DOI: (B)(6) 2020, DOR: (B)(6) 2020, AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain

  MAUDE report 10206942 ↗
• InjuryJun 3, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Naturally Worn; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Naturally Worn

  PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT IN 1997, ELITE MODULAR STEM WITH DURALOC CUP AND LIPPED LINER. LINER WEAR RESULTING IN REVISION SURGERY. NO RECORDS AVAILABLE OF THE PRIMARY CASE. RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

  MAUDE report 10116522 ↗
• InjuryDec 12, 2019Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  REV TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT: (B)(6), (B)(6) 2019. DURALOC LINER IMPLANTED APPROX 20 YRS AGO. LYSIS VISIBLE ON XRAY. THE LINER WAS REMOVED AND THE SURGEON NOTED IT WAS WORN DURALOC CUP AND STABILITY STEM WERE STABLE AND REMAINED INSITU. THE 28 HEAD WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A TS CERAMIC REVISION HEAD.

  Patient problems: Osteolysis

  MAUDE report 9460375 ↗
• InjuryMar 12, 2019Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS POLY WEAR. DOI: UNK; DOR: (B)(6) 2019, LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 8413683 ↗
• InjuryAug 21, 2018Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN AND DISCOMFORT DUE TO POLY WEAR. THE SURGEON EXCHANGED THE HEAD, POLY LINER AND LOCKING RING. DOI: (B)(6) 1996; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Discomfort; Not Applicable; Pain

  MAUDE report 7801047 ↗
• MalfunctionFeb 20, 2018Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PENETRATING WEAR OVER 20 YEARS OF ACTIVITY. DOI: (B)(6) 1997, DOR: (B)(6) 2018.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 7283703 ↗
• InjuryAug 29, 2017Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  DER STATES THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A THA 16 YEARS AGO. IT IS ALSO STATED THAT THE X-RAYS SHOW SOME WEAR. UPDATE 8/21/2017 REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS INDICATE REVISION FOR POLYETHYLENE BEARING WEAR, PAIN, AND BURSITIS/SOFT TISSUE INFLAMMATION/REACTIVE WEAR DEBRIS TISSUE. HARMS ADDED. COMPLAINT UPDATED ON: 8/28/2017.

  Patient problems: Irritation; Pain; Synovitis

  MAUDE report 6827805 ↗