DURALOC 1220-28-156Recalls & reported problems
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Duraloc MARATHON ACETABULAR LINER 10 DEGREES Lip 28mm ID 56 or 68mm OD · Class 2 · Implant
All models of DURALOC (93)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 10
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 10
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295015192), received between Jan 8, 2018 and Feb 2, 2026 — classified as 10 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
- Naturally Worn3
- Illegible Information1
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation3
- Insufficient Information2
- Joint Laxity2
- Pain2
- No Code Available1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Osteolysis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 2, 2026Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ACETABULAR LINER WAS REPLACED DUE TO NORMAL WEAR. THE LEFT HIP WAS INITIALLY IMPLANTED ABOUT 30 YEARS AGO, THE EXACT DATE/LOCATION NOT KNOWN. THE LOCKING RING, LINER AND HEAD BALL WERE REPLACED. NO OTHER COMPONENTS WERE REPLACED. DVD A NEW APEX HOLE ELIMINATOR WAS INSERTED IN THE CUP AS THE EXISTING APEX HOLE ELIMINATOR APPEARS TO HAVE GONE THROUGH THE ACETABULAR CUP. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: ON 1(B)(6) 2025, AFFECTED SIDE- LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 24238658 ↗InjurySep 3, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2025. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 22954030 ↗InjuryJun 25, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD HIP INSTABILITY, 56 DURALOC CUP,56 10 DEGREE LINER, 56 DYNAMIC LOCKING RING, 28 +0 11/13 S-ROM HEAD REMOVED. NO DELAY IN CASE WHILE REMOVING OLD COMPONENTS. DOI- UNKNOWN. DOR- (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE- LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 19606270 ↗InjuryFeb 5, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PATIENT WAS REVISED WITH ACETABULAR LINER AND HEAD BALL DUE TO DISLOCATION. SURGICAL DELAY UNKNOWN. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2024, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 18640517 ↗InjurySep 22, 2023Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO WORN POLY. THE HEAD AND LINER WERE EXCHANGED. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2023, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 17798486 ↗InjurySep 8, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
COMPASS CASE (B)(4) REPORT: REVISION WAS DONE FOR POLY WEAR, DISLOCATION. LOOSENING INTERFACE: NON-CEMENTED.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 12440809 ↗InjuryJun 15, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD OSTEOLYSIS BEHIND CUP. DOI: UNKNOWN DOR: (B)(6) 2021 RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Osteolysis
MAUDE report 12003238 ↗InjuryMar 2, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Illegible Information; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Illegible Information
REVISION OF A DEPUY DURALOC CUP. REASON FOR REVISION WAS DUE TO RECURRENT DISLOCATION. 56 CUP WAS WELL FIXED (UNKNOWN REF NUMBER AND LOT NUMBER). IT WAS REMOVED WITH THE LINER AND A COMPETITOR CUP WAS IMPLANTED. HEAD WAS ALSO REMOVED (UNKNOWN REF AND LOT NUMBER) AND REPLACED WITH ARTICULEZE 9/10 ELITE FEMORAL HEAD. STEM WAS WELL FIXED AND WAS NOT REMOVED. UNSURE WHEN THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS DONE. RIGHT SIDE.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 11398445 ↗InjuryJun 30, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN. ORIGINAL IMPLANT DATE UNKNOWN. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2020; RIGHT SIDE.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain
MAUDE report 10212554 ↗InjuryJan 8, 2018Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS ECCENTRIC POLY WEAR OF THE POLYETHYLENE LINER. THE ORIGINAL DATE OF IMPLANT IS UNKNOWN. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2017. LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7171270 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented devices
- NA 1365-51-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented753 reports
- NA 1365-50-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented412 reports
- ARTICUL/EZE 1365-21-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented1 recall280 reports
- ARTICUL/EZE 1365-11-000Depuy (Ireland) · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented1 death262 reports
- LFIT 6260-9-236Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented256 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented2 deaths239 reports
- ELEOS™ 25002111EOnkos Surgical, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/polymer, cemented3 deaths230 reports
- Novation 130-36-52Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Cemented2 recalls124 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page