Skip to content

DURALOC 1220-32-056Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Duraloc MARATHON ACETABULAR LINER Neutral 32mm ID 56 or 68mm OD · Class 2 · Implant

All models of DURALOC (93)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295015475), received between May 22, 2018 and Apr 28, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Naturally Worn2

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information1
  • Not Applicable1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 28, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT THE REVISION PROCEDURE DUE TO WEAR DUE TO THE LONG IMPLANTATION TIME. THE NEW INLAY WAS INSERTED INTO A CUP THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN IMPLANTED FOR YEARS. WHEN REPLACING THE DURALOC, THE DYNAMIC LOCK RING WAS MISSING. THERE WAS A MISUNDERSTANDING WHEN MAKING THE REQUEST. THE PATIENT HAD TO UNDERGO ANOTHER OPERATION THE NEXT DAY DUE TO THE MISSING LOCK RING. THE PATIENT SUFFERED NO HARM. NO FURTHER CONSEQUENCES HAVE BEEN REPORTED AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21919646 ↗
  • InjuryMay 22, 2018Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN DUE TO POLY WEAR. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; UNKNOWN SIDE.

    Patient problems: Not Applicable; Pain

    MAUDE report 7533658 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page