DURALOC 1220-32-154Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 16 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295015543), received between Aug 8, 2017 and Sep 17, 2026 — classified as 14 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Naturally Worn” (10 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 16 most recent of 16 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionSep 17, 2026Naturally Worn

  It was reported that there was a worn Duraloc PE Inlay. There was no patient harm.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 50804006 ↗
• MalfunctionSep 11, 2026Naturally Worn

  It was reported that a worn-out right insert had been observed. It had worn out over time. The device was still implanted. The issue related to polyethylene wear associated with long-term use and not to the locking ring itself. All available information has been disclosed.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 50736669 ↗
• InjuryMar 2, 2026Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON IS ORDERING A PATIENT SPECIFIC HIP-INLAY FOR A PLANNED REVISION BECAUSE OF NORMAL AND EXPECTED PE-WEAR LEFT SIDE. THERE HAS BEEN NO ALLEGATION OF ANY PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. DOI: >10 YRS AGO. DOR: PATIENT IS NOT HOSPITALIZED AT THE MOMENT. THE REVISION WILL TAKE PLACE IN ABOUT THREE TO SIX MONTHS. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT SIDE.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 24488368 ↗
• InjuryFeb 23, 2026Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THE SURGEON IS ORDERING A PATIENT SPECIFIC HIP-INLAY FOR A PLANNED REVISION BECAUSE OF NORMAL AND EXPECTED PE-WEAR RIGHT SIDE. DOI: (B)(6) 2011. DOR: PLANNED TO TAKE PLACE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THERE HAS BEEN NO ALLEGATION OF ANY PRODUCT DEFICIENCY. NO PATIENT HARM. NO SURGICAL DELAY.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 24416566 ↗
• InjuryNov 12, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  WORN OUT DURALOC MARATHON HIP IMPLANT ON THE RIGHT SIDE. REVISION SURGERY IS NEEDED. DO1: (B)(6) 2005. DOR: UNKNOWN.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 23534870 ↗
• InjuryNov 10, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS WORN OUT PE ON THE RIGHT HIP SIDE. REVISION SURGERY IS NEEDED. THE EXACT IMPLANT DATE IS NOT KNOWN, ONLY YEAR 2005.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 23511927 ↗
• InjuryOct 28, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS WORN OUT PE ON THE LEFT HIP JOINT. REVISION SURGERY IS NEEDED.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 23402039 ↗
• InjuryOct 27, 2025Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  WORN OUT PE ON THE RIGHT HIP JOINT. REVISION SURGERY IS NEEDED. IMPLANT WAS IMPLANTED ON AN UNKNOWN DATE (B)(6) 2007.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 23394992 ↗
• InjuryDec 22, 2023No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event

  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED: A. IT WAS MENTIONED AS ¿CATASTROPHIC EFFECT TO PATIENT OUTCOMES¿ ¿ COULD YOU PLEASE MORE INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT CONSEQUENCES! SURGERY WAS DELAYED FOR OVER 30MINS WHILST FRAIL PATIENT WAS ON TABLE B. HOW LONG WAS THE SURGICAL DELAY? 1.5 HOURS PRE SURGERY AND 30 MINS INTRAOPERATIVELY C. WAS THE PATIENT UNDER ANESTHESIA? IF YES, HOW LONG ? YES, APPROXIMATELY 6 HOURS.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 18382931 ↗
• InjuryFeb 3, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2021, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 11275854 ↗
• InjurySep 11, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: (B)(6) 2009; DOR: (B)(6) 2020; RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain

  MAUDE report 10524231 ↗
• InjuryAug 24, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS DISLOCATING HIP; IMPLANTED CONSTRAINED LINER. DOI: (B)(6) 2019, DOR: (B)(6) 2020, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

  MAUDE report 10443344 ↗
• InjuryMar 17, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENTS HIP WAS SLIGHTLY UNSTABLE, SO THE SURGEON CHANGED TO A 36 HEAD TO INCREASE STABILITY. DOI: (B)(6) 2019; DOR: (B)(6) 2020; RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 9842940 ↗
• InjuryMay 17, 2019Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  PATIENT'S LAWYER SENT A LETTER TO J&J MEDICAL AS HE IS CLAIMING COMPENSATION: PATIENT RECEIVED HIP-TEP RIGHT SIDE ON (B)(6) 2015. ON (B)(6) 2018 PE WEAR WAS DIAGNOSED IN HOSPITAL AND A DOCTOR`S REPORT STATED "THE AMOUNT OF WEAR WITHIN THIS SHORT PERIOD IS VERY UNUSUAL. MATERIAL DEFECT (IN GAMMA STERILISATION) POSSIBLE. CHANGE OF INLAY IN TIME INTERVAL NECESSARY." DOR: (B)(6) 2019.

  Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; No Code Available

  MAUDE report 8619519 ↗
• InjurySep 5, 2018Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN AND WORN POLY LINER. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Not Applicable; Pain

  MAUDE report 7845758 ↗
• InjuryAug 8, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

  PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN IN HER HIP, IT WAS ALSO STATED THAT THERE WAS A TRUNNIONOSIS/METALLOSIS SUSPECTED. UPDATE 7/10/2017 DER REVIEWED FOR REPORTABILITY DECISION. AN UNKNOWN DURALOC LOCKING RING WAS BEEN ADDED TO THE COMPLAINT. THE HARM FOR ADVERSE TISSUE REACTION HAS BEEN REMOVED AS IT PERTAINS TO THE COMPETITOR PRODUCT STEM AND HEAD COMPONENTS. COMPLAINT UPDATED ON: 8/8/2017.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 6773644 ↗