DURALOC 1220-36-560Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295015796), received between Oct 10, 2017 and May 7, 2021 — classified as 7 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryMay 7, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  THE PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR DISLOCATION. DOI: (B)(6) 2000, DOR: (B)(6) 2021, AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 11794000 ↗
• InjuryApr 2, 2020Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS CONVERSION TO CONSTRAINED LINER. THE SUPERIOR POLY WEAR WAS THE ISSUE. NO ADVERSE SYMPTOMS.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 9917554 ↗
• InjuryJan 30, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  UNF AND MEDICAL RECORDS RECEIVED. AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS, THE PATIENT COMPLAINS PAIN, HIP INJURY AND DISLOCATIONS. THE PATIENT HAS HAD 4 POSTERIOR DISLOCATIONS AFTER A HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE, ALL POSTERIOR AND THE LAST TWO DURING NORMAL ACTIVITY. A CLOSE REDUCTION WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2011. THE PATIENT WAS THEN REVISED FOR INSTABILITY LEFT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. OPERATIVE NOTED HAS NO ADDITIONAL ALLEGATIONS. DOR: (B)(6) 2011; DOR: (B)(6) 2011; LEFT HIP. 1ST REVISION CAPTURED ON (B)(4).

  Patient problems: Injury; Joint Dislocation; Joint Disorder; No Code Available; Pain

  MAUDE report 9649005 ↗
• InjuryDec 26, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  PFS AND MEDICAL RECORDS RECEIVED. PFS ALLEGES PAIN, DISLOCATION AND LIMITED ACTIVITIES. AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR FAILED LEFT HIP THA. OPERATIVE NOTE REPORTED, THERE WAS NO SIGINIFICANT INFLAMMATORY CHANGE IN THE SYNOVIUM. THERE WERE NO OTHER EVENTS REPORTED IN THE MEDICAL RECORDS. DOI: (B)(6) 2000 (UNK CUP); DOI: (B)(6) 2004 (HEAD AND LINER); DOR: (B)(6) 2005; LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available; Pain

  MAUDE report 9519963 ↗
• InjuryDec 16, 2019Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HEAD, LINER AND STEM WERE EXCHANGED DUE TO POLY WEAR. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2019. LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 9475613 ↗
• InjuryAug 20, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS DISLOCATION. THIS PATIENT HAS A RIGHT TOTAL HIP WITH AML STEM AND DURALOC CUP. THE HIP IS DISLOCATING, SO THE SURGEON DID A LINER AND HEAD EXCHANGE TO A CONSTRAINED CONSTRUCT. THE STEM AND CUP WERE WELL FIXED AND RETAINED. DOI: (B)(6) 2018. DOR: (B)(6) 2018. RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Not Applicable

  MAUDE report 7798707 ↗
• InjuryOct 10, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS DISLOCATION. ORIGINAL CUP PLACEMENT WAS A LITTLE HORIZONTAL. THE DER ACTUALLY STATED THAT THE PATIENT CHOOSE TO HAVE A CONSTRAINED LINER INSTEAD OF CUP REVISION.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 6934206 ↗