Skip to content

PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-28-148Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PINNACLE HIP SOLUTIONS ALTRX POLYETHYLENE ACETABULAR LINER +4 10 DEGREE 28mm ID 48mm OD · Class 2 · Implant

All models of PINNACLE ALTRX (98)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295016007), received between Mar 14, 2019 and Sep 15, 2023 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Fracture2
  • Naturally Worn1

Patient problems

  • No Code Available5
  • Pain2
  • Foreign Body Reaction1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 15, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO FRACTURED LINER. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: JULY 22, 2020. DOR: (B)(6), 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 17760682 ↗
  • InjuryOct 15, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO AN INFECTED HIP. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2020, AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10684940 ↗
  • InjuryMay 14, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAINFUL HIP. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2020; RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 10057149 ↗
  • InjuryDec 13, 2019Fracture; Naturally Worn; Fracture; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS BEING REVISED FOR VERTICAL CUP AND BROKEN LINER. THE SURGEON REVISED CUP, LINER, AND HEAD. METALLOSIS WAS OBSERVED BECAUSE THE HEAD HAD WORN THROUGH THE LINER AND WAS ARTICULATING ON THE SHELL. METAL IONS ARE NOT KNOWN. NO FURTHER PATIENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE. DOI: 2003. DOR: (B)(6) 2019, LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9467078 ↗
  • InjuryMay 17, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    A TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO CHRONIC HIP DISLOCATION.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8619305 ↗
  • InjuryMar 14, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    PT HAD PRIMARY L-THR ON (B)(6) 2010. PT HAD SUBSEQUENT LINER DISASSOCIATION AND WAS REVISED. A DER WAS WRITTEN AND SUBMITTED AT THAT TIME. NOW, PT HAD ANOTHER LINER DISASSOCIATION. SURGEON ELECTED TO CEMENT A STRKYER 28MM LINER INTO PINNACLE CUP, FEARING YET A THIRD LINER WOULD DISASSOCIATE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 8419753 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page