PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-44-464Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295016670), received between Dec 18, 2018 and Apr 8, 2020 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryApr 8, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  PFS ALLEGES THAT THE PATIENT CONTINUES TO EXPERIENCE PAIN AND DECREASED MOBILITY. DOI: (B)(6) 2013. DOR: NO REVISION REPORTED, (RIGHT HIP).

  Patient problems: Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint; No Code Available; Pain

  MAUDE report 9935799 ↗
• InjuryMar 20, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR DISLOCATION. EXTRACTED THE FEMORAL HEAD AND LINER. IMPLANTED A 40MM ARTICULEZE HEAD AND 64 X 40 +4 NEUTRAL CONSTRAINED LINER.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

  MAUDE report 9860568 ↗
• InjuryApr 17, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  LITIGATION ALLEGES DISLOCATION AFTER 1ST REVISION. DOI: (B)(6) 2014, DOR: NONE REPORTED, (LEFT HIP).

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 8522329 ↗
• InjuryMar 13, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  PPF AND MEDICAL RECORDS RECEIVED. PPF ALLEGES PSEUDOTUMOR, CONSTRAINED LINER, ABDUCTOR MUSCLE REPAIR, DISLOCATION WITH OPEN REDUCTION AND ELEVATED METAL IONS AFTER FIRST REVISION. AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS, THERE WAS NO OPERATIVE NOTE PROVIDE FOR THE SECOND REVISION. THE POLYETHYLENE LINER, CERAMIC HEAD, AND THE STEM WERE REPORTED TO THE IMPACTED PRODUCT DUE TO THE PPF ALLEGATION. DOI: (B)(6) 2012 - DOR: (B)(6) 2013 (RIGHT HIP) SECOND REVISION.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available; Tissue Damage

  MAUDE report 8416493 ↗
• InjuryDec 19, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  PPF ALLEGES DISLOCATION AND INFECTION AFTER FIRST REVISION. DOI: (B)(6) 2015 - DOR: NONE REPORTED (LEFT HIP). SEE (B)(4) FOR THE FIRST REVISION.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 8181168 ↗
• InjuryDec 18, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  LITIGATION ALLEGES DISLOCATION WITH CLOSED REDUCTION AFTER FIRST REVISION.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 8175772 ↗