DURALOC 1249-50-000Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295019756), received between Nov 3, 2020 and Nov 12, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjuryNov 12, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION. PATIENT DISLOCATED TWICE. DR DECIDED TO CONSTRAIN. THE CUP WAS FINE. IN THIS REVISION, THE DYNAMIC LOCKING RING WAS BENT SO SURGEON TRIED ANOTHER ONE BEFORE PUTTING IN A CONSTRAINED LINER. IT IS UNKNOWN IF IT WAS BENT WHEN IT WAS IMPLANTED, OR AS A RESULT OF THE DISLOCATIONS. DOI: (B)(6) 2025, DOR: (B)(6) 2025, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP. RELATED COMPLAINT (B)(4) CAPTURES PREVIOUS DISLOCATION.

  Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

  MAUDE report 23535977 ↗
• InjuryApr 18, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED STATES THAT THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY.

  Patient problems: Pain

  MAUDE report 19134343 ↗
• InjuryOct 10, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT HEAD LINER EXCHANGED WAS PREFORMED UNEVENTFULLY. A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF METALLOSIS WAS EVIDENT LEADING SURGEON TO BELIEVE THE LOCKING RING HAD BEEN DISASSOCIATED FOR SOME TIME. NO PATIENT HARM OCCURRED. IT WAS UNKNOWN, IF THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY. DOI- UNKNOWN. DOR- (B)(6) 2023. AFFECTED SIDE- RIGHT HIP.

  Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction

  MAUDE report 17908001 ↗
• InjuryAug 26, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED INDICATED THAT THE CUP WAS REMOVED DUE TO MALPOSITION. THE HEAD HAD WORN THE POLY DOWN OVER TIME.

  Patient problems: Joint Laxity

  MAUDE report 12373617 ↗
• InjuryNov 3, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS HAVING INSTABILITY ISSUES SO THE SURGEON REMOVED THE CUP AND REPLACED IT WITH A COMPETITOR MDM CUP AND PUT A NEW BALL ON THE SOLUTION STEM. COULD NOT FIND INFO ON THE FIRST SURGERY WHEN AND WHERE IT WAS DONE. COULD NOT LOCATE REF OR PART #S FOR THE CUP THAT WAS REMOVED. DOI: (B)(6) 2019, DOR: (B)(6) 2020, LEFT HIP.

  Patient problems: No Code Available

  MAUDE report 10778110 ↗