BIOLOX DELTA 1365-28-210Recalls & reported problems
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · BIOLOX DELTA CERAMIC FEMORAL HEAD Diameter 28mm +0 11/13 TAPER · Class 3 · Implant
All models of BIOLOX DELTA (40)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 19
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 19
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 19 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295033240), received between Feb 8, 2018 and Jul 8, 2026 — classified as 19 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (11 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated11
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
- Naturally Worn2
- Fracture1
- Noise, Audible1
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation12
- Pain8
- No Code Available7
- Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint3
- Insufficient Information2
- Unspecified Infection2
- Erythema1
- Fall1
Recent adverse event reports
The 19 most recent of 19 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 8, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT DISLOCATED OUT OF THEIR CONTRAINED LINER DUE TO WEAR. DOCTOR DECIDED TO DO A LINER AND HEAD EXCHANGE AFTER WASHING OUT THE HIP. DOI: (B)(6) 2019. DOR: (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 25747100 ↗InjuryApr 6, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD A RIGHT TOTAL HIP DONE WITH A SROM STEM AND SROM CUP PLACED AROUND THIRTY YEARS AGO. PATIENT DEVELOPED POLY WEAR, SO PATIENT HAD A HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE DONE ON (B)(6) 2019. WAS DOING GREAT UNTIL RECENTLY; THE PATIENT FELL AND DISLOCATED. THE SURGEON WANTED TO REMOVE THE CUP. DID A COMPLETE ACETABULAR REVISION UTILIZING DUAL MOBILITY KEEPING THE SROM HEAD IN PLACE. DOI: (B)(6) 2019. DOR: (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Fall; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 24790752 ↗InjuryOct 16, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO CHRONIC DISLOCATIONS. DOI: (B)(6) 2020 DOR: (B)(6) 2025 AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 23318550 ↗InjuryOct 15, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT CAME IN AFTER DISLOCATING TWICE IN A WEEK. DR DECIDED IT BEST TO REMOVED THE CUP, LINER, HEAD AND STEM TO CHANGE THE ORIENTATION OF THE IMPLANT TO BE MORE STABLE. HE PLACED A NEW 16X11 +6 STEM AND A 28 +6 HEAD INTO A ZIMMER CUP/DUAL MOBILITY. IT WAS UNKNOWN, IF THERE WAS A SURGICAL DELAY. NO MORE PATIENT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME. DOI- UNKNOWN. DOR- (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE- LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 20452902 ↗InjuryApr 11, 2023Fracture; Noise, Audible; Fracture; Noise, Audible
THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A HIP THAT WAS MAKING A GRINDING NOISE THAT HAD BEEN ONGOING FOR 3 MONTHS. HE HAD A PREVIOUS HIP SURGERY 9 YEARS AGO. UPON X-RAY, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE DELTA CERAMIC SROM HEAD HAD FRACTURED INTO 3 PIECES. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE HEAD AND LINER THAT HAD WORN THROUGH BY THE "TRUNNION" OF THE SROM STEM. HE REPLACED WITH A METAL HEAD AND NEW ALTRX LINER. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: (B)(6) 2014. DOR: (B)(6) 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 16712356 ↗InjuryMar 21, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Naturally Worn; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Naturally Worn
PATIENT UNDERWENT A LEFT HIP FIRST REVISION ON (B)(6) 2021 (B)(4) WHERE A CONSTRAINED POLY LINER AND CERAMIC HEAD WERE PLACED. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A HEAD AND LINER REVISION SECONDARY TO SUSTAINING AN ANTERIOR DISLOCATION. INTRAOPERATIVELY, A HEMATOMA WAS EVACUATED. RESIDUAL METAL DEBRIS WAS IDENTIFIED. THE LINER DEMONSTRATED POLYWEAR. THERE WAS EVIDENCE OF WEAR OF THE CERAMIC HEAD FROM WHERE THE HEAD HAD DISLOCATED CAUSING ABRASION AND LOSS OF THE CERAMIC COATING. DOI: (B)(6) 2021; DOR: (B)(6) 2022; LEFT HIP SECOND REVISION.
Patient problems: Erythema; Hematoma; Itching Sensation; Joint Dislocation; Pain
MAUDE report 16581747 ↗InjuryDec 1, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2022, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 15894015 ↗InjuryJul 20, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PATIENT UNDERWENT PRIMARY THR WHERE A COMPETITOR FEMORAL COMPONENT AND A COMPETITOR ACETABULAR COMPONENT WAS UTILISED (DR. (B)(6), DATE UNKNOWN). PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN AND THE COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED AND A TEMPORARY "KIWI" SPACER IMPLANTED - COMPETITOR STEM AND CUP (DR. (B)(6), DATE UNKNOWN) PATIENT WAS RETURNED FOR THE SECOND OF THE TWO STAGE PROCEDURE WHERE A COMPETITOR ACETABULAR SHELL WITH DUAL MOBILITY AND AN SROM STEM WAS UTILISED ((B)(6) 2022). PATIENT HAS PRESENTED WITH ONGOING PAIN AND A DECISION WAS MADE TO PERFORM A WASHOUT WITH LINER EXCHANGE AND A HEAD EXCHANGE ((B)(6) 2022). NO OBVIOUS SIGNS OF INFECTION WERE EVIDENT. UNSURE WHETHER ANY ORGANISMS HAVE BEEN CULTURED. DID THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE A POST-OP DEVICE MALFUNCTION? UNKNOWN, IF YES, PLEASE DESCRIBE. POSSIBLE INFECTION - BUT THIS SUSPECTED AT TIME OF S ROM STEM IMPLANTATION AS THIS WAS THE SECOND OF A TWO STAGE PROCEDURE, DID THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE AN ADVERSE EVENT SUCH AS INFECTION, NON-UNION, ALLERGIC REACTION, OSTEOPOROSIS, OVERLOADING, PAIN, DEGENERATIVE DISEASES, BLEEDING OR OOZING? UNKNOWN, DID THE PATIENT REQUIRE REVISION SURGERY OR HARDWARE REMOVAL? YES, FACILITY NAME OF ORIGINAL IMPLANT: (B)(6) HOS
Patient problems: Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 15067068 ↗InjuryMar 30, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO UNKNOWN REASON. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2022; AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 13950589 ↗InjuryMay 26, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT SHOWED UP IN ER AT AN OUTSIDE FACILITY AFTER DISLOCATING HER HIP. PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO OPERATING SURGEON AS ON CALL SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO RELOCATE. COMPONENTS WELL FIXED AND WELL POSITIONED. HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE PERFORMED WITH A 10 DEGREE LINER SHOWING EXCELLENT STABILITY. NO WEAR WAS NOR IMPINGEMENT WAS NOTED ON LINER. DOI: (B)(6) 2016 - DOR: (B)(6) 2021 (LEFT HIP).
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 11891690 ↗InjuryNov 10, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
InjuryNov 4, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION STATED THAT THE AFFECTED SIDE WAS THE RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 10786673 ↗InjuryApr 7, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT DISLOCATED HER CONSTRAINED LINER. OLD LINER AND HEAD WERE REMOVED AND A NEW CONSTRAINED LINER AND HEAD WERE IMPLANTED. THE LINER AND RING WERE STILL WELL FIXED AND IN CORRECT POSITION. THE HEAD WAS STILL WELL FIXED TO THE STEM. THE SURGEON HAS SUSPICION THAT THE PATIENT IS VOLUNTARILY DISLOCATING. DOI: (B)(6) 2020; DOR: (B)(6) 2020; AFFECTED SITE: RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available
MAUDE report 9933293 ↗InjuryJul 17, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PPF AND MEDICAL RECORDS RECEIVED. PPF ALLEGES DISLOCATION WITH OPEN REDUCTION AND ELEVATED METAL IONS AFTER FIRST REVISION. AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS RECURRENT DISLOCATING RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. DOI: (B)(6) 2013. DOR: (B)(6) 2014. (RIGHT HIP) 2ND REVISION.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available
MAUDE report 8799363 ↗InjuryJul 1, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
PFS ALLEGES DISLOCATIONS, PAIN, WALKING DIFFICULTY AND LIMITED MOBILITY. AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS, IT WAS STATED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS RECURRENT INSTABILITY AND DISLOCATION. REVISION NOTES REPORTED THAT THE DEPUY HEAD WAS RETAINED AND COMPETITOR ACETABULAR COMPONENTS WERE REPLACED. DOI: (B)(6) 2017; DOE: DEC 13, 2017; LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint; No Code Available; Pain
MAUDE report 8748780 ↗InjuryApr 23, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
LITIGATION ALLEGES DISLOCATION, DISASSOCIATION, PAIN, MEDICAL DEVICE SITE JOINT MOVEMENT IMPAIRMENT, AND EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. DOI: (B)(6) 2010; DOR: (B)(6) 2015; (RIGHT HIP).
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint; No Code Available; Pain
MAUDE report 8539962 ↗InjuryApr 1, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
PPF AND STICKER SHEETS RECEIVED. PPF ALLEGES DISLOCATION WITH OPEN AND CLOSED REDUCTION. DOI: (B)(6) 2012 - DOR: (B)(6) 2012; (RIGHT HIP). THIS PC IS FOR THE SECOND REVISION OF THE RIGHT HIP. SEE (B)(4) FOR THE FIRST REVISION.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available
MAUDE report 8470129 ↗InjuryFeb 14, 2019Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
LITIGATION PAPERS ALLEGE: CORROSION AND FRICTION WEAR CAUSED LARGE AMOUNTS OF TOXIC COBALT-CHROMIUM METAL IONS AND PARTICLES TO BE RELEASED INTO PATIENT'S BLOOD AND TISSUE AND BONE SURROUNDING THE IMPLANT; SINCE SURGERY, PATIENT HAS SUFFERED SYMPTOMS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO PAIN, SWELLING, SORENESS, DIFFICULTY WALKING, DECREASED MOBILITY AND/OR THE NEED FOR REVISION SURGERY. UPDATE: ALTHOUGH LITIGATION REPORTED THIS AS METAL ON METAL, PRODUCT INFORMATION INDICATES THE PATIENT HAD POLY ON METAL. DOI: (B)(6) 2008; DOR: NOT REPORTED; (LEFT HIP).
Patient problems: Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint; Pain; Swelling
MAUDE report 8340390 ↗InjuryFeb 8, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS DISLOCATION.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 7250718 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented839 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented643 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented335 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented263 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-330Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented255 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented253 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-056Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented220 reports
- SUMMIT POROCOAT 1570-11-120Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented1 death204 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page