Skip to content

ATTUNE 1504-01-226Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · Attune Knee System FEMORAL POROCOAT CRUCIATE RETAINING NARROW SIZE 6N RIGHT CEMENTLESS · Class 2 · Implant

All models of ATTUNE (1475)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
12
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
12
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295041573), received between Oct 28, 2020 and Jun 25, 2026 — classified as 12 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 1 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 2 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem8
  • Osseointegration Problem2
  • Use of Device Problem2
  • Loss of or Failure to Bond1

Patient problems

  • Joint Laxity5
  • Pain5
  • Inadequate Osseointegration3
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Cramp(s) /Muscle Spasm(s)1
  • Fall1
  • Fatigue1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 25, 2026Osseointegration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD REVISION TO ADDRESS POTENTIAL LOOSENING OF FEMORAL IMPLANT. IMPLANT WAS REMOVED, UNSURE IF LOOSE AS FEMUR WAS ADHERED TO LUGS AND OTHER POINTS. LOOSENING INTERFACE WAS MARKED AS BONE TO IMPLANT. DOI: (B)(6) 2024. DOR: (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 25627105 ↗
  • InjuryJun 23, 2026Use of Device Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD REVISION DONE TO CORRECT PATELLA BAJA AND POTENTIAL CONCERN FOR LOOSENING OF PRESSFIT FEMUR. FEMUR WAS WELL FIXED AT THE POSTS. NOT SURE IF IT WAS TRULY LOOSE. NO OTHER ISSUES OR CONCERNS WERE GIVEN. DOI- (B)(6) 2024. DOR- (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE- RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 25596891 ↗
  • InjuryApr 16, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT TIBIA WITH AUGMENTS, POLY AND FEMUR WERE ALL REMOVED DUE TO INSTABILITY. ALL PIECES WERE REMOVED FROM THE PT. AND THE FIELD IMMEDIATELY IN THEIR ENTIRETY AND THERE WAS NO HARM DONE TO THE PATIENT. I HAVE NO FURTHER INFORMATION. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 24903791 ↗
  • InjuryAug 22, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON REVISED A TKR. REASON FOR REVISION WAS PAIN AND LOOSENING. SURGEON REMOVED FEMUR, TIBIA AND POLY INSERT IMPLANTS WHICH WERE WELL FIXED AND IN GROWN. CEMENTLESS FEMUR APPEARED TO BE IMPLANTED IN FLEXED POSITION WHICH LEFT A GAP BETWEEN THE ANTERIOR DISTAL FEMORAL BONE AND THE IMPLANT. POSTERIOR FEMUR HAD VERY GOOD BONE IN GROWTH AND WAS DIFFICULT TO REMOVE. ATTUNE REVISION IMPLANTED. PATELLA WAS LEFT IN-SITU. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 22877037 ↗
  • InjuryMar 25, 2025Loss of or Failure to Bond; Loss of or Failure to Bond

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED AND STATED THAT THE PATIENT WANTED TO COMPLAIN THAT THE IMPLANT WAS NOT WORKING AT ALL.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Cramp(s) /Muscle Spasm(s); Fall; Fatigue; Joint Laxity; Pain; Swelling/ Edema

    MAUDE report 21686392 ↗
  • InjuryNov 25, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: UNK. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 20775442 ↗
  • InjuryApr 11, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD A BEARING SPIN . THE DECISION TO REMOVE ALL IMPLANTS AND REVISE TO ATTUNE REVISION AS THE KNEE HAD BECOME UNSTABLE IN FLEXION. BETTER RESULT AT END OF CASE.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 16713230 ↗
  • InjurySep 23, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO A PAINFUL POROUS ATTUNE KNEE THAT WAS REVISED TO ATTUNE REVISION APPROXIMATELY 4 YEARS OUT AND WAS LIKELY FIBROUS INGROWTH. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: 4 YEARS AGO, DOR: (B)(6) 2022, AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 15470470 ↗
  • InjuryJan 10, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION COMPLETED DUE TO INFECTED KNEE. ALL IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED. DOI: (B)(6) 2021. DOR: (B)(6) 2021. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 13215170 ↗
  • InjurySep 21, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS INSTABILITY. DOI: (B)(6) 2021, DOR: (B)(6) 2021, RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 12505676 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2017, PATIENT RECEIVED A RIGHT ATTUNE TOTAL KNEE TO TREAT OSTEOARTHRITIS. THE PATELLA WAS RESURFACED AND DEPUY CEMENT WAS UTILIZED. THERE WERE NO INDICATED INTRA-OPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS. ON (B)(6) 2019, PATIENT RECEIVED A RIGHT KNEE REVISION TO ADDRESS PAIN, DECREASE IN ACTIVE EXTENSION, DECREASE IN ACTIVE FLEXION, AND TIBIAL TRAY LOOSENING AT AN UNKNOWN INTERFACE. THE SURGEON DID NOT SPECIFY WHICH INTERFACE THE TIBIAL TRAY WAS LOOSE. ALL COMPONENTS WERE REVISED. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED WITH DEPUY PRODUCTS AND TWO DEPUY CEMENT PRODUCTS. THERE WERE NO INDICATED INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS. DOI: (B)(6) 2017. DOR: (B)(6) 2019. RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Pain

    MAUDE report 11591144 ↗
  • InjuryOct 28, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS INSTABILITY AND LOOSENING OF THE TIBIAL IMPLANT AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. DOI: (B)(6) 2020, DOR: (B)(6) 2020, RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 10750879 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page