Skip to content

RECLAIM 1975-20-095Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · RECLAIM REVISION HIP SYSTEM CONICAL PROXIMAL BODY CEMENTLESS TENSILE BAR 20mm x 95mm 95mm LOCKING BOLT · Class 2 · Implant

All models of RECLAIM (149)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295076896), received between Mar 25, 2021 and Oct 24, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

3 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K102080); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 1 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • Limb Fracture1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 24, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23378112 ↗
  • InjuryApr 29, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT WAS DISLOCATING AND WAS REVISED DUE TO VERSION ANGLE. IT HAD BEEN PUT AT THE WRONG VERSION ANGLE AND NEEDED TO BE ADJUSTED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH NO SURGICAL DELAY OR CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. DOI: (B)(6) 2022. DOR: (B)(6) 2025. AFFECTED SIZE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21929193 ↗
  • InjuryApr 15, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PROCEDURE WAS A SECOND STAGE REVISION, PATIENT HAD PREVIOUS IMPLANT REMOVED APPROX 8 WEEKS AGO, NON JNJ IMPLANTS, DUE TO INFECTION. CEMENT SPACER WAS REMOVED AND THE FEMUR AND ACETABULUM WERE LAVAGED EXTENSIVELY. THE PATIENT WOUND WAS THEN CLOSED AND REDRAPED WITH NEW DRAPES AND NEW SET OF STERILE INSTRUMENTS. ACETABULUM WAS PREPPED FOR PINNACLE MULTI HOLE CUP AND WAS IMPLANTED WITH 2 SCREWS AND DUAL MOBILITY LINER, WITH NO ISSUES. FEMUR WAS THEN PREPARED FOR RECLAIM STEM, REAMED TO 20MM AND 20X190 ANGLED STEM WAS IMPLANTED. TRIAL PERFORMED USING 95X40 TRIAL NECK. DEFINITIVE PROXIMAL BODY WAS PLACED IN THE USUAL FASHION FOLLOWING THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE, THE TAMP WAS USED TO ENGAGE THE BODY TO THE TAPER ON THE STEM, THE ASSEMBLY TOOL WAS THEN USED TO SEAT THE TAPER. THE SURGEON NOTED A SOUND JUST PRIOR TO THE TENSILE BAR BROKE. WHEN HE REMOVED THE ASSEMBLY TOOL HE NOTED THAT THE BODY APPEARED LOOSE. THE SUSPICION WAS THAT THE FEMUR HAD FRACTURED, WE REMOVED ALL THE IMPLANTS AND TOOK AN X-RAY WHICH CONFIRMED THE FRACTURE WHICH HAS APPEARED TO BEGIN AT THE WEAK POINT WHERE THE SINUS IN THE PROXIMAL FEMUR HAD BEEN DUE TO THE INFECTION. THE FRACTURE WAS REDUCED USING CABLES AND A DISTAL

    Patient problems: Limb Fracture

    MAUDE report 19106113 ↗
  • InjuryMar 25, 2021Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE STEM SUBSIDED AND REQUIRED REVISION. DOI: (B)(6) 2019 DOR: (B)(6) 2021 LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11568256 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K102080. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-2084-2014 · Jun 3, 2014 · Terminated
    RECLAIM DISTAL TAPERED Distal Stem, various sizes. Taper Protector Sleeve. RECLAIM Revision Hip System Orthopedic Manual Surgical Instrument, used to ensure the locking taper surf
  • Z-2082-2014 · Jun 3, 2014 · Terminated
    RECLAIM Taper Protector Sleeve. RECLAIM Revision Hip System Orthopedic Manual Surgical Instrument, used to ensure the locking taper surface of the Distal Stem is protected during
  • Z-2083-2014 · Jun 3, 2014 · Terminated
    RECLAIM DISTAL TAPERED, Angled Distal Stem, various sizes. Taper Protector Sleeve. RECLAIM Revision Hip System Orthopedic Manual Surgical Instrument, used to ensure the locking ta

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page