Skip to content

LPS 1987-16-214Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · LPS FEMORAL STEM BOWED 15.5mm x 150mm POROCOAT · Class 2 · Implant

All models of LPS (113)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295078883), received between Nov 22, 2022 and Jan 3, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Osseointegration Problem2

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 3, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    PATIENT WAS COMPLAINING OF THIGH PAIN, SURGEON WAS WORRIED ABOUT LACK OF BONE GROWTH WITHIN THE FEMORAL STEM PROSTHESIS. UPON INSPECTION, THE ENTIRE PROSTHESIS WAS REMOVED FROM THE FEMORAL SIDE AND A CEMENTED BOWED STEM WAS IMPLANTED. A LARGER INSERT WAS ALSO TRIALED AND THEN INSERTED. DOI: (B)(3) 2023. DOR: (B)(3) 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 18436121 ↗
  • InjuryNov 22, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    REVISION COMPLETED DUE TO LOOSE DISTAL FEMORAL STEM. FEMORAL STEM WAS REPLACE WITH A CEMENTED STEM. DOI: (B)(6) 2015. DOR: (B)(6) 2015.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 15847218 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page