Skip to content

LPS 1987-27-126Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · LPS TIBIAL INSERT HINGE UNIVERSAL XSMALL 26mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of LPS (113)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
9
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295079453), received between Aug 25, 2017 and Aug 8, 2024 — classified as 9 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2

Patient problems

  • No Code Available5
  • Joint Dislocation4
  • Pain3
  • Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
  • Inflammation1
  • Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • Not Applicable1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 8, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD A DISLOCATED DISTAL FEMUR REPLACEMENT AND WAS BROUGHT IN FOR REVISION. A 25 MM IPS SEGMENT AND A 26MM XSMALL LPS HINGE INSERT WERE REMOVED. A NEW 40MM LPS SEGMENT AND 23MM IPS SEGMENT WERE IMPLANTED. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 19939128 ↗
  • InjuryJul 19, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    PATIENT¿S PREVIOUS PROXIMAL TIBIA REPLACEMENT (2020), CONTINUING TO DISLOCATE POLY OUT OF PROX TIBIA COMPONENT. REVISION SURGERY DEMONSTRATED PROX TIBIA REPLACEMENT COMPONENT WAS ROTATED, CAUSING POLY INSERT TO DISLOCATE FROM POST. ALSO WHEN REMOVED, EVIDENCE OF METAL CHARRING IN THE IMPLANT NOTED, WHICH CAN LEAD TO METALOSIS OF COMPONENTS/TISSUE. WAS SURGERY DELAYED DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT? --> NO, ACTION TAKEN WHEN EVENT OCCURRED? --> REPLACED PROXIMAL TIBIA COMPONENT, ADDED SEGMENTAL 25MM COMPONENT , WAS PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED? --> YES, WERE FRAGMENTS GENERATED? --> YES, IF YES, WERE THEY REMOVED EASILY WITHOUT ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION? --> UNKNOWN, OTHER INFORMATION: --> METAL WEAR NOTED , PATIENT STATUS/ OUTCOME / CONSEQUENCES --> YES, PATIENT CONSEQUENCE DESCRIPTION/WAS THERE A CLINICAL OUTCOME EXPERIENCED BY THE PATIENT (INFECTION, INFLAMMATION, ETC.)?--> INFLAMMATION, DISLOCATIONS, WAS OTHER MEDICAL INTERVENTION (E.G. X-RAYS, ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES, PRESCRIPTIONS, OTC, REVISION) REQUIRED: --> UNKNOWN, IF YES, DESCRIBE --> ROTATION OF COMPONENT IN SEGMENTAL SLEEVE CAUSED REPEATED POLY INSERT DISLOCATIONS AND POTENTIAL METAL BREAKDOWN , IS THE PATIENT PART OF A CLIN

    Patient problems: Inflammation

    MAUDE report 15055063 ↗
  • InjuryAug 7, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INFECTION AND LOOSENING OF THE UNKNOWN COMPONENT AT THE UNKNOWN INTERFACE. FEMORAL COMPONENT AND INSERT WERE REMOVED. WASHED PATIENT OUT AND TRIM PLANTED. DOI: (B)(6) 2019. DOR: (B)(6) 2020; RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10379087 ↗
  • InjuryMar 24, 2020Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT SAID THEIR KNEE DISLOCATED WHILE GETTING UP FROM A SITTING POSITION. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO PERFORM AN OPEN REDUCTION OF THE KNEE, BUT FOUND THE KNEE WAS STILL A LITTLE TOO LOOSE. HE DECIDED HE WANTED TO UP THE POLY TO A 28MM POLY. THE NEW POLY WAS INSERTED AND A NEW PIN WAS PLACED. KNEE WAS RUN THROUGH A RANGE OF MOTION AND FOUND TO BE SATISFACTORY. THE CLOSING PROCESS BEGAN. DOI: (B)(6) 2019, DOR: (B)(6) 2020, LEFT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9874203 ↗
  • InjuryDec 11, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS INCREASING PAIN, DECREASED RANGE OF MOTION, AND LOOSENING OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AT THE CEMENT TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. CEMENT MANUFACTURER AND DATE OF IMPLANTATION ARE UNKNOWN. PATELLA WAS WORN AND TIBIAL CONSTRUCT (UNKNOWN PART AND LOT NUMBER) REMAIN INSITU. FEMUR AND PATELLA WERE REVISED. DOI: UNKNOWN; DOR: (B)(6) 2019; LEFT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Limited Mobility Of The Implanted Joint; Pain

    MAUDE report 9451838 ↗
  • InjuryNov 14, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PREVIOUSLY FELL AND AN I&D WITH AN EXCHANGE OF COMPONENTS WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019 THAT WAS CAPTURED UNDER (B)(4). THEN, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED AGAIN DUE TO LOOSENING OF THE FEMORAL SLEEVE AT THE IMPLANT TO BONE INTERFACE AND A DISLOCATION OF THE POLY/TIBIAL INSERT FROM THE TIBIAL TRAY. ALL THE FEMORAL COMPONENTS WERE REVISED AND THE WELL FIXED TIBIAL COMPONENTS WERE RETAINED. DOI: (B)(6) 2019; DOR: (B)(6) 2019; RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9322089 ↗
  • InjuryOct 3, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PAIN.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 7932218 ↗
  • InjuryAug 13, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR REVISION RELATED TO PAIN, STIFFNESS, PAINFUL HINGE WITH NICKEL ALLERGY. DOI: (B)(6) 2015; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; (RIGHT, KNEE).

    Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction; Not Applicable; Pain

    MAUDE report 7776416 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 13, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    DER STATED THAT OBESE PATIENT WITH HINGE LEFT KNEE- 9 YEARS AGO. IT WAS INDICATED THAT THE PATIENT HAD SHEERED POST OFF THE BOTTOM OF THE POLY AND REVISED TO A 31MM. DOI: 9 YEARS AGO; DOR: (B)(6) 2018; LEFT KNEE.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 7267917 ↗
  • InjuryAug 25, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS DISLOCATION AND LAXITY.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 6821025 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page