QUICKSET 2274-55-000Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295109303), received between Oct 9, 2018 and Nov 1, 2024 — classified as 11 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (11 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• MalfunctionNov 1, 2024Break; Break

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2024, THE FORCEPS TIP BROKE.

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 20591384 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 19, 2024Break; Break

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE HOLDER BROKE WHILE INSERTING SCREW. IT DID NOT HAPPEN IN SURGERY.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 19567004 ↗
• MalfunctionJan 25, 2024Break; Break

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT FORCEPS BROKE DURING USE. THEY HAD BACKUPS AVAILABLE SO SURGERY WAS NOT DELAYED.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 18579389 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 20, 2023Break; Break

  HOLD FOR CO 10.24. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE BROKE WHILE USE. WAS SURGERY DELAYED DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT? UNKNOWN, WAS PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED? UNKNOWN, WERE FRAGMENTS GENERATED? UNKNOWN, IF YES, WERE THEY REMOVED EASILY WITHOUT ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION? UNKNOWN, PATIENT STATUS/ OUTCOME / CONSEQUENCES , WAS OTHER MEDICAL INTERVENTION (E.G. X-RAYS, ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES, PRESCRIPTIONS, OTC, REVISION) REQUIRED: NKNOWN, IS THE PATIENT PART OF A CLINICAL STUDY UNKNOWN, (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF NONE, DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF NONE, (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF NONE, DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF NONE, (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF NONE, DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF NONE, (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF NONE, DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF NONE, (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF NONE, DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF NONE, BY CHECKING THIS BOX I CERTIFY THAT ALL INFORMATION THAT ARE KNOWN/AVAILABLE HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ANY NEW INFORMATION WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE, THE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE SUBMITTED THROUGH CST.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 17977223 ↗
• MalfunctionMay 22, 2023Break; Break

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT ONE OF THE TIPS BROKE OFF. THE INSTRUMENT BROKE INTO 2 PIECES AND BOTH WERE RECOVERED. THERE WAS NO DELAY IN THE CASE AND THE PATIENT DID NOT SUFFER ANY ADVERSE SIDE AFFECTS AS A RESULT OF THIS INSTRUMENT BREAKING.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 16975564 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 18, 2022Break; No Apparent Adverse Event; Break; No Apparent Adverse Event

  1. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE GRATER ARE DULL. 2. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE TIBIAL PUNCH AND IMPACTOR HANDLE BROKE. 3. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW INSTRUMENT RUSTED.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 15625373 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 8, 2022Break; Device-Device Incompatibility; Break; Device-Device Incompatibility

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW HOLDING FORCEP SNAPPED AT THE TIP RENDERING IT UNABLE TO HOLD SCREWS. IT WAS USED FOR THE FIRST SCREW BUT NOT THE SECOND SCREW. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY.

  Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

  MAUDE report 15182999 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 6, 2020Break; Material Deformation; Break; Material Deformation

  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED STATED THAT THE TIP OF THE HUDSON ADAPTOR BROKE AND ALL PIECES WERE RECOVERED. THE HOLDING FORCEPS WERE BENT, SO THE CLAMP DID NOT LINE UP ANYMORE.

  Patient problems: No Code Available; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 10639181 ↗
• MalfunctionJun 3, 2020Break; Break

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW FORCEPS WERE FOUND IN SET BROKEN AT THE END. IT WAS NOT USED IN THE SURGERY.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 10114490 ↗
• MalfunctionAug 30, 2019Break; Break

  SCREW HOLDING FORCEPS BROKE WHILST IN USE, INSERTING THE ACETABULAR SCREW. THERE WAS MINIMAL FORCE USED, AND THE INSTRUMENT ONLY BROKE INTO 2 PIECES WHICH WERE RETRIEVED.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 8951319 ↗
• MalfunctionOct 9, 2018Break; Break

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW HOLDING FORCEPS TIP BROKE OFF DURING SURGERY.

  Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

  MAUDE report 7948211 ↗