CORAIL 3L93709Recalls & reported problems
Depuy (Ireland) · CORAIL HIP SYSTEM CEMENTLESS FEMORAL STEM 12/14 AMT 125 DEGREES KLA SIZE 9 HA COATED HIGH OFFSET COLLAR · Class 2 · Implant
Quick summary
This DePuy Corail hip stem is a cementless metal hip implant used in total hip replacement. The 38 adverse event reports mostly describe the stem failing to grow into the bone properly or loosening over time, leading to pain, revision surgery, and in one case the stem tip fracturing off inside the thigh bone. Reports mention 35 injuries and 1 death. No recalls name this device.
AI-generated from the FDA records on this page and checked automatically against the numbers below. Read the details before relying on it.
- Adverse event reports
- 38
- Deaths reported
- 1
- Injuries reported
- 35
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 38 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295168867), received between Aug 8, 2017 and Sep 2, 2025 — classified as 1 death, 35 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (14 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Loss of Osseointegration14
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem6
- Osseointegration Problem6
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available3
- Migration3
- Loose or Intermittent Connection2
- Migration or Expulsion of Device2
- Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging2
Patient problems
- Inadequate Osseointegration22
- No Code Available15
- Pain14
- Adhesion(s)2
- Fall2
- Foreign Body Reaction2
- Insufficient Information2
- Limb Fracture2
Recent adverse event reports
The 25 most recent of 38 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjurySep 2, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING PAIN IN HIS LEG AND FELT THAT SOMETHING HAD CHANGED SINCE HIS SURGERY. X-RAYS REVEALED THAT THE DISTAL TIP OF THE STEM HAD FRACTURE OFF AND WAS LOSE INSIDE THE CANAL. SURGEON REMOVED CERAMIC HEAD, REMOVED THE OLD STEM WHICH CAME OUT EASY AND THE TREPHINEX DOWN TO REMOVE THE SMALL PIECE THAT WAS LODGED DISTAL. IN ADDITION, THE SURGEON SWAPPED OUT THE POLY LINER FOR A NEW ONE, CEMENTED IN A NEW STEM AND HEAD BEFORE REDUCING. NO FURTHER ISSUES WERE NOTED. DOI: (B)(6) 2024, DOR: (B)(6) 2025, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 22947779 ↗InjuryJan 7, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S STEM WAS REVISED FOR PAIN. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS A LOOSENING. DOI: (B)(6) 2019. DOR: (B)(6) 2024. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain
MAUDE report 21091724 ↗MalfunctionJul 16, 2024Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging
THE CUSTOMER RECEIVED WET IMPLANTS. MULTIPLE PRODUCTS ARE DAMAGED. THE CASE WAS PUSHED TO TODAY FROM LAST THURSDAY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 19750145 ↗InjuryJun 3, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED: WAS THERE ANY PATIENT HARM/CONSEQUENCE RELATED TO THE EVENT? THE PATIENT BROKE THEIR FEMUR WHEN THEY FELL AS STATED IN REPORT. WAS THERE ANY SURGICAL DELAY RELATED TO THE EVENT? NO.
Patient problems: Fall; Limb Fracture
MAUDE report 19449184 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2023Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging; Tear, Rip or Hole in Device Packaging
IT WAS REPORTED BEFORE THE SURGERY THAT THE PACKAGING OF THE PRODUCT WAS FOUND TO BE DAMAGED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16876338 ↗InjuryFeb 1, 2023Osseointegration Problem; Migration; Osseointegration Problem; Migration
CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR REVISION DUE TO ASEPTIC LOOSENING; LOOSENING OF THE STEM. EVENT IS SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED MODERATE. EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO DEVICE. EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO PROCEDURE. DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2012. DATE OF EVENT: (B)(6) 2020. (RIGHT HIP). TREATMENT: REVISION; LINER, HEAD, AND STEM WERE REVISED.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Unspecified Tissue Injury
MAUDE report 16276921 ↗InjuryDec 6, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON AN UNKNOWN DATE, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT THE SURGERY WITH THE STEM IN QUESTION. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT ANY SURGICAL DELAY. AFTER THE SURGERY, THE PATIENT HAD A PERI-STEM BONE FRACTURE. THE STEM WAS REMOVED ON UNKNOWN DATE. THE REVISION SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT ANY SURGICAL DELAY. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Limb Fracture
MAUDE report 15923939 ↗InjurySep 23, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR ASEPTIC LOOSENING. EVENT IS SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED SEVERE. EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO DEVICE. EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO PROCEDURE. DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2013, DATE OF REVISION: (B)(6) 2022, DATE OF EVENT: (B)(6) 2022, (RIGHT HIP). TREATMENT: REVISION; LINER, STEM, AND HEAD WERE REMOVED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: REVISION WAS COMPLETED DUE TO PAIN AND FEMORAL STEM LOOSENING UPON ENTERING THE JOINT, SCAR TISSUE WAS ENCOUNTERED AND REMOVED. THE FEMORAL STEM WAS NOTED TO BE GROSSLY LOOSE AT THE BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. THE POLY LINER WAS NOTED TO HAVE SOME WEAR. THE HEAD AND STEM WERE REVISED TO COMPETITOR PRODUCT, LINER WAS REVISED WITH DEPUY, CUP LEFT IN PLACE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT INDICATION OF COMPLICATION BY THE SURGEON.
Patient problems: Adhesion(s); Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Scar Tissue
MAUDE report 15470383 ↗InjuryMay 13, 2022Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
THE PATIENT HAD PAIN IN HIS LEFT THP BECAUSE THE STEM WAS IMPLANTED IN VARUS. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: UNKNOWN. LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 14396210 ↗InjuryFeb 28, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SURGEON INDICATED FOR A LOOSE FEMORAL STEM. NO SURGICAL DELAY. DOI: (B)(6) 2022. DOR: (B)(6) 2022; AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 13618676 ↗InjuryJan 14, 2022Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO THE PATIENT'S FALLING DURING REHAB AND LOOSENING AT AN UNCEMENTED INTERFACE AT THE STEM AND CUP COMPONENTS. SURGERY WAS JUST DONE ON (B)(6)2021. IMPLANTS DISLODGED AFTER FALL. DOI: (B)(6) 2021. DOR: (B)(6) 2022. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: Fall; Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 13257604 ↗InjuryDec 28, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
CLINICAL NOTIFICATION UPDATE WAS REVIEWED AND THE DIAGNOSIS HAS BEEN UPDATED FROM SURGICAL SITE INFECTION TO STITCH ABSCESS.
Patient problems: Abscess; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 13102233 ↗InjuryOct 6, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2021, LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 12583705 ↗InjuryMay 14, 2021Migration; Migration
QUESTIONS: A. WAS THERE A SURGICAL DELAY DURING THE REVISION SURGERY? IF YES, WHAT WAS THE DURATION OF THE DELAY? B. WAS THE PATIENT EXPERIENCING ANY ADVERSE SYMPTOMS THAT LED TO THE REVISION SURGERY? ANSWERS FOR YOUR QUESTIONS: PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAINFUL TOTAL HIP. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Pain
MAUDE report 11825553 ↗InjuryNov 12, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
REVISION OF THE CORAIL PINNACLE. THE PROXIMAL FEMORAL COMPONENT SHOWED SIGNS OF LOOSENING. PATIENT HAD THIGH PAIN.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available; Pain
MAUDE report 10829261 ↗InjuryJul 22, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT FEMORAL STEM WAS LOOSE AT BONE TO IMPLANT INTERFACE. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2020, AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available
MAUDE report 10308587 ↗InjuryJul 14, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Unintended Movement; Migration; Loss of Osseointegration; Unintended Movement; Migration
REVISION OPERATIVE NOTES 06/10/2020 INDICATE THE PATIENT RECEIVED A LEFT TOTAL HIP REVISION DUE TO PAIN, WITH LOOSENING, SUBSIDENCE AND VARUS ANGULATION OF THE FEMORAL STEM. UPON ENTERING THE JOINT, THE FEMORAL STEM WAS NOTED TO BE GROSSLY LOOSE. SIGNIFICANT SCAR TISSUE AND BONE WAS REMOVED FROM THE MEDIAL GREATER TROCHANTER FOR ACCESS. SCAR TISSUE WAS ALSO NOTED TO BE REMOVED FROM THE ACETABULAR SIDE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT INDICATION OF COMPLICATION BY THE SURGEON.
Patient problems: Adhesion(s); Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available; Pain
MAUDE report 10271730 ↗InjuryJul 1, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT STEM BECAME LOOSE, REMOVED THE STEM AND PUT A SUMMIT CEMENTED AND READJUSTED CUP VERSION WITH A NEW CUP. DOI: (B)(6) 2019, DOR: (B)(6) 2020, LEFT SIDE.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available
MAUDE report 10219240 ↗InjuryMay 29, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A CORAIL STEM AND PINNACLE CUP THAT THE LINER HAD DISASSOCIATED FROM THE CUP. UPON SURGERY IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE STEM WAS LOOSE AND PULLED OUT BY HAND. SURGEON REPLACED LINER AND CONVERTED TO AN ACTIS STEM. ALL PARTS WERE SOLID AFTER REPLACING. DOI: (B)(6) 2015; DOR: (B)(6) 2020; LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available
MAUDE report 10102827 ↗InjuryMay 19, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD A LOOSE FEMORAL STEM. SURGEON REVISED THE STEM AND REPLACED THE LINER AND HEAD DOI: (B)(6) 2018. DOR: (B)(6) 2020; AFFECTED SIDE: UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available
MAUDE report 10070711 ↗InjuryJan 7, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Biocompatibility; Loss of Osseointegration; Biocompatibility
SCF AND MEDICAL RECORD RECEIVED. SCF ALLEGES PAIN AND ALVAL/SOFT TISSUE. AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORD, OPERATIVE NOTE REPORTED LOOSENING OF THE ACETABULAR AND FEMORAL COMPONENT.
Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Test Result
MAUDE report 9559016 ↗InjuryAug 7, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
PPF AND STICKER SHEETS RECORD RECEIVED. PPF ALLEGES LOOSENING OF THE STEM, METAL WEAR AND METALLOSIS. DOI: (B)(6) 2010, DOR: (B)(6) 2018, (RIGHT HIP).
Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction; Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available
MAUDE report 8871194 ↗InjuryJul 23, 2019Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration
REVISION OF FEMORAL COMPONENT CORAIL FEMORAL COMPONENT FOR WHAT IS BELIEVED TO BE ASEPTIC LOOSENING. FEMORAL COMPONENT, FEMORAL HEAD AND ACETABULAR LINER REVISED. IMPACTED PRODUCTS: 1 X 3L93709; CORAIL2 LAT COXA VARA SIZE 9; LOT NO: 5271037- DISCARDED; 1 X 122136052; ALTRX NEUT 36IDX52OD; LOT NO: C82285 - DISCARDED; 1 X 136536310; DELTA CER HEAD 12/14 36MM +1.5; LOT NO: 8198858 - DISCARDED; 1 X 121732052; PINN SECTOR W/GRIPTION 52MM; LOT NO: 753770- STILL IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available
MAUDE report 8818171 ↗InjuryMay 20, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT RECENTLY STARTED COMPLAINING OF THIGH PAIN IN THE RIGHT HIP. A BRIDGING PEDISTLE HAD DEVELOPED AT THE DISTAL TIP OF THE CORAIL STEM. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE CORAIL STEM, HEAD AND PINNACLE LINER. THE PINNACLE CUP REMAINED IMPLANTED. DOI: (B)(6) 2016; DOR: (B)(6) 2019, RIGHT HIP.
Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain
MAUDE report 8624588 ↗InjuryMay 1, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE. LEFT HIP.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8570298 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.