Skip to content

S-ROM 52-1552Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · S-ROM CRUCIATE HEAD PERIPHERAL SCREW 5mm x 25mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of S-ROM (92)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295170730), received between Nov 9, 2017 and Aug 6, 2021 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration3
  • Pain2
  • No Code Available1
  • Osteolysis1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 6, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN AND LOOSENING OF THE CUP. DOI: (B)(6) 1997 ; DOR: (B)(6) 2000; (LEFT HIP).

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 12285824 ↗
  • InjuryAug 6, 2021Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN AND LOOSENING OF THE CUP. DOI: (B)(6) 1997 ; DOR: (B)(6) 2000; (LEFT HIP).

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain

    MAUDE report 12285822 ↗
  • InjuryDec 6, 2018Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    THIS REVISION HIP WAS FOR REVISION OF LOOSE ACETABULAR COMPONENT. NOT CONFIRMED BUT APPEARED TO BE A REVISION OF A PREVIOUS HIP ARTHROPLASTY. OSTEOLYSIS PRESENT IN PROXIMAL FEMUR HOWEVER FEMORAL COMPONENT REMAINED INSITU AS WELL FIXED.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available; Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 8137167 ↗
  • InjuryNov 9, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    COMPLAINT DESCRIPTION: PATIENT WAS REVISED TO ADDRESS INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7016783 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page