Skip to content

ATTUNE 1511-01-105Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · ATTUNE KNEE SYSTEM REVISION FEMORAL SLEEVE POROCOAT PARTIALLY COATED 45MM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of ATTUNE (1475)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
12
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
11
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295436522), received between May 30, 2019 and Sep 17, 2024 — classified as 11 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loss of Osseointegration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 2 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 1 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem10
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Migration1
  • Osseointegration Problem1

Patient problems

  • No Code Available3
  • Pain3
  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Anemia2
  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Discomfort1

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 17, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT BEGAN TO DRAIN AGAIN POST ANTIBIOTIC SPACER FASHIONED WITH LPS COMPONENTS. ALL COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED. DURING DISSECTION AND REMOVAL, A VASCULAR INJURY OCCURRED. THE VASCULAR TEAM CAME IN TO REPAIR THE VESSELS. A NEW SPACER UTILIZING LPS COMPONENTS WAS PLACED AFTER A THOROUGH DEBRIDEMENT AND PLACEMENT OF RESORBABLE ANTIBIOTIC BEADS. THERE WAS A DELAY IN THE PROCEDURE AND HARM DID OCCUR BUT THERE WAS NO MENTION OF ALLEGATION AGAINST ANY DEPUY COMPONENTS CAUSING SAID INJURY. DOI: (B)(6) 2024; DOR: (B)(6) 2024; AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Fluid Discharge; Perforation of Vessels

    MAUDE report 20239528 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    EVENT DATE: BLANK ALERT DATE: 28-JUN-2019 COUNTRY OF EVENT: OUS PROCEDURE: TYPE OF REVISION - OPERATIVE DETAILS PART 1: FULL PROCEDURE: KNEE REVISION USING ATTUNE - OPERATIVE DETAILS PART 2: PS RP OPERATIVE SIDE: LEFT DATE OF SURGERY: (B)(6) 2019 EVENT DESCRIPTION (DIAGNOSIS): OPERATIVE WOUND DEHISCED CENTRAL 8CMS: FURTHER REVISION SURGERY REQUIRED. UPDATED EVENT DESCRIPTION: CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR OPERATIVE WOUND DEHISCED CENTRAL 8CMS: WOUND DEHISCENCE REQUIRING DAIR. EVENT IS SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED SEVERE. EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO PROCEDURE. EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO DEVICE. DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2019 DATE OF EVENT: 26 JUN 2019 (LEFT KNEE) TREATMENT: IRRIGATION & DEBRIDEMENT.

    Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 19645936 ↗
  • InjuryApr 18, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    SUBJECT ID: (B)(6). STUDY NO: (B)(6). CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR PATELLA TENDON RUPTURE AND INFECTION. EVENT IS SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED SEVERE. EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO DEVICE. EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO PROCEDURE. DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2019. DATE OF EVENT: (B)(6) 2024. (RIGHT KNEE). TREATMENT: RECONSTRUCTION OF PATELLA TENDON, I&D, INJECTED MEDICATION, AND REPEATED DAIR PROCEDURES

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection; Unspecified Tissue Injury

    MAUDE report 19133203 ↗
  • InjuryApr 16, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    SUBJECT ID: (B)(6). STUDY NO: (B)(6). CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR FLEXION DEFICIT AT RIGHT KNEE. EVENT IS SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED MODERATE. EVENT IS POSSIBLY RELATED TO DEVICE. EVENT IS NOT RELATED TO PROCEDURE. DATE OF IMPLANT: (B)(6) 2019; DATE OF EVENT: (B)(6) 2023; (RIGHT KNEE) . TREATMENT: DIAGNOSTIC INTERVENTION AND RESECTION OF HETEROTOPIC BONE.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 19117291 ↗
  • InjuryJan 16, 2024Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    PATIENT HAD BEEN DOING WELL POST SPACER. BEGAN HAVING PAIN A FEW DAYS PRIOR TO STATED SURGERY DATE. XRAYS WERE UNREMARKABLE. PATIENT TAKEN TO OR AND FOUND THAT THE FEMORAL SLEEVE HAD BECOME LOOSE. IN THE PROCESS OF SEPARATION AND REMOVAL, THE TIBIAL SIDE WAS ALSO REMOVED. A THOROUGH DEBRIDEMENT AND IRRIGATION WAS PERFORMED. FEMUR AND TIBIA WERE THEN PREPARED FOR A NEW SPACER UNEVENTFULLY AND RESORBABLE ANTIBIOTIC BEADS WERE PLACED ALONG WITH THE NEW SPACER. NO PATIENT HARM OCCURRED. NO DELAY WAS EXPERIENCED. DOI: (B)(6), 2023. DOR: (B)(6), 2023. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT KNEE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Pain; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 18517697 ↗
  • InjuryJun 24, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR REVISION OF TOTAL KNEE TO ADDRESS LOOSE FEMUR EVENT IS SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED MODERATE EVENT IS DEFINITELY RELATED TO DEVICE AND IS DEFINITELY RELATED TO PROCEDURE. DATE OF IMPLANTATION: (B)(6) 2019, DATE OF EVENT (ONSET): 03/01/2022. (RIGHT KNEE). TREATMENT: REVISION OF FEMORAL CONSTRUCT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14799624 ↗
  • InjuryMar 17, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION COMPLETED DUE TO PAIN AND LOOSENING. IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH PRODUCTS AND INTERFACES WERE LOOSE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 13791985 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 1, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR POST-OPERATIVE ANEMIA. EVENT IS NOT SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED MILD. EVENT IS DEFINITELY NOT RELATED TO DEVICE AND IS DEFINITELY RELATED TO PROCEDURE. DATE OF IMPLANTATION: (B)(6) 2020, DATE OF EVENT (ONSET): (B)(6) 2020, (LEFT KNEE). TREATMENT: 2 X ERYTHROCYTE CONCENTRATE (TRANSFUSION 2 UNITS PACKED RED BLOOD CELLS).

    Patient problems: Anemia

    MAUDE report 11263882 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 2, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Migration; Loss of Osseointegration; Migration

    CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR LOOSE FEMORAL SLEEVE : MIGRATION/LOOSENING - FEMORAL. EVENT IS NOT SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED MODERATE. EVENT IS DEFINITELY RELATED TO DEVICE AND IS DEFINITELY NOT RELATED TO PROCEDURE. DATE OF IMPLANTATION: (B)(6) 2019. DATE OF EVENT (ONSET): (B)(6) 2020. (LEFT KNEE). TREATMENT: NONE.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; No Code Available

    MAUDE report 10109042 ↗
  • InjuryApr 17, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO AN INFECTION IN HIS KNEE, ALL IMPLANTS REMOVED, SURGEON STATED THE INFECTION WAS THE SAME BUG THAT REQUIRED HIS PRIMARY IMPLANTS TO BE REMOVED IN THE FIRST PLACE. UNSURE IF THE IMPLANTS REMOVED FROM THE PRIMARY WERE OURS WAS SURGERY DELAYED DUE TO THE REPORTED EVENT? --> UNKNOWN, WAS PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED? --> UNKNOWN, WERE FRAGMENTS GENERATED? --> UNKNOWN, IF YES, WERE THEY REMOVED EASILY WITHOUT ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION? --> UNKNOWN, PATIENT STATUS/ OUTCOME / CONSEQUENCES --> YES, PATIENT CONSEQUENCE DESCRIPTION/WAS THERE A CLINICAL OUTCOME EXPERIENCED BY THE PATIENT (INFECTION, INFLAMMATION, ETC.)?--> INFECTION REASON FOR THIS REVISION. IT WAS THE SAME ORIGINAL BUG THE PATIENT HAD WHEN HIS FIRST IMPLANT WAS REVISED., WAS OTHER MEDICAL INTERVENTION (E.G. X-RAYS, ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES, PRESCRIPTIONS, OTC, REVISION) REQUIRED: --> NO, IS THE PATIENT PART OF A CLINICAL STUDY --> UNKNOWN, (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF -->NONE, DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF -->NONE, (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF -->NONE, DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF -->NONE, (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF -->NONE, DEVICE IN POSSESSION OF -->NONE, (B)(4). DEVICE PROPERTY OF -->NONE, DEVICE IN POSSESSION

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9972162 ↗
  • InjuryDec 11, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    CLINICAL ADVERSE EVENT RECEIVED FOR POST-OPERATIVE ANEMIA. EVENT IS NOT SERIOUS AND IS CONSIDERED MILD. EVENT IS DEFINITELY NOT RELATED TO DEVICE AND IS DEFINITELY RELATED TO PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Anemia; Discomfort; Pain

    MAUDE report 9450915 ↗
  • InjuryMay 30, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    BECAUSE THE PATIENT HAD EXTREMELY THIN FEMORAL CORTICES PROF (B)(6) CEMENTED THE TIBIAL COMPONENT IN SEPARATELY TO THE FEMORAL COMPONENT. THE TIBIAL CEMENTATION WENT WELL. HOWEVER, WHEN PROF (B)(6) IMPLANTED THE DEFINITIVE FEMORAL COMPONENT WITH 50MM FEMORAL SLEEVE THE FEMUR FRACTURED. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE FEMORAL COMPONENT BEFORE THE CEMENT HAD CURED AND UPON INSPECTION OF THE FRACTURE DEEMED IT NECESSARY TO CONVERT TO A LPS DISTAL FEMORAL COMPONENT WHICH HE HAD ON STANDBY FOR THIS SURGERY. UNFORTUNATELY THE ATTUNE REVISION RP TIBIAL COMPONENT WAS EXTREMELY WELL FIXED AND AS THE SURGERY HAD ALREADY TAKEN OVER 3 HOURS THE SURGEON FELT IT UNWISE TO CONTINUE WITH A TIME CONSUMING EXTRACTION OF THE WELL FIXED TIBIAL COMPONENT. HE THEREFORE HAD NO OPTION BUT TO USE AN INCOMPATIBLE LPS INSERT WITH THE LPS FEMUR AND ATTUNE REVISION RP TIBIA.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); No Code Available

    MAUDE report 8655624 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page