Skip to content

ATTUNE 2506-40-007Recalls & reported problems

Depuy (Ireland) · ATTUNE KNEE SYSTEM REVISION RP BASE TRIAL SIZE 7 · Class 1

All models of ATTUNE (1475)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 10603295450818), received between Sep 11, 2020 and Sep 11, 2020 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 11, 2020Loose or Intermittent Connection; Device-Device Incompatibility; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Loose or Intermittent Connection; Device-Device Incompatibility; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    DURING A 2ND STAGE KNEE REVISION THE SURGEON REPORTED FRACTURING THE PROXIMAL TIBIA WHEN SEATING THE ATTUNE REVISION TIBIAL BROACH IN THE PROXIMAL TIBIA. THE SURGEON HAD ALREADY PREPARED THE PROXIMAL TIBIA BONE WITH A STEM PILOT/BROACH AND TIB TRAY HOWEVER WHEN HE EXTRACTED THE TRIAL CONSTRUCT (WITH RP ADAPTER AND SYSTEM HANDLE) THE TIB TRAY ROTATION WAS NOT LOCKED AND THEREFORE HE WAS REQUIRED TO RE-SEAT THE STEM TRIAL/BROACH INTO THE PREPARED BONE ENVELOPE AND LOCK OFF HIS RP TRAY ROTATION BEFORE EXTRACTING AND TRANSFERRING THIS TO THE DEFINITIVE IMPLANT/ASSEMBLING. HE COMMENTED THAT WHEN THE REGISTRAR RE-INSERTED THE BROACH INTO THE BONE SHE HIT IT TOO HARD WHICH HE THINKS CAUSED THE FRACTURE. IT WAS WORTH NOTING THAT THE REGISTRAR ALSO HAD GREAT DIFFICULTY EXTRACTING THE TRIAL STEM AND BROACH/TRAY CONSTRUCT ONCE THE ROTATION HAD BEEN LOCKED AND WHEN THE SURGEON TOOK OVER, HE ENDED UP REMOVING THE RP TRIAL TRAY AND ATTACHING THE BROACH HANDLE TO REMOVE THE BROACH (WHICH IS WHEN HE NOTICED THE SMALL FRACTURE IN THE PROX TIB) AND REPEATING THE ABOVE STEPS TO SET THE ROTATION. THE SURGERY CONTINUED AS PLANNED AND HE ADVISED THAT THIS FRACTURE WOULD NOT CHANGE THE OUTCOME OF THE SUR

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); No Code Available

    MAUDE report 10521865 ↗

Other TEMPLATE devices

All TEMPLATE devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page