Skip to content

EMPHASYS 4722-56-036Recalls & reported problems

Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · EMPHASYS POLYETHYLENE LINER AOX NEUTRAL 56-58MM 36MM · Class 2 · Implant

All models of EMPHASYS (34)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 10603295500407), received between Feb 3, 2025 and Sep 22, 2026 — classified as 7 injuries, 3 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 2 reportsMar 2026: 1 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 2 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem5
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Difficult to Insert2
  • Fracture1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection4
  • Joint Dislocation2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 22, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    It was reported that the patient was revised due to suspected infection.DOI: (b)(6) 2026.DOR: (b)(6) 2026.Affected side: Right Hip.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 50854096 ↗
  • InjurySep 21, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 50847473 ↗
  • InjuryMar 4, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT POLY SWAP DUE TO AN INFECTION. DOI: UNKNOWN. DOR: (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24507984 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 5, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD INFECTION DUE TO IMPLANT. DOI- UNKNOWN. DOR- (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE- LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 24269652 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 3, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THIS PATIENTS HIP WAS REVISED DUE TO INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT'S PRIMARY FEMORAL HEAD, ACETABULAR LINER, AND ACETABULAR SHELL WERE REMOVED. THEY WERE REPLACED BY AN EMPHASYS MULTIHOLE ACETABULAR SHELL AND DUAL MOBILITY COMPONENTS FOR ADDED STABILITY. DOI: (B)(6) 2024. DOR: (B)(6) 2026. AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 24245092 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 12, 2025Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THE EMPHASYS LINER WOULD NOT SEAT INTO THE ACETABULAR CUP DURING THE PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. A 10 MINUTE SURGICAL DELAY WAS NOTED. NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23789317 ↗
  • InjuryAug 26, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO POSSIBLE INFECTION. A HEAD LINER EXCHANGE WAS PERFORMED. DOI: UNKNOWN, DOR: (B)(6) 2025, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 22898144 ↗
  • InjuryJul 14, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    PATIENT WAS REVISED TO DUAL MOBILITY DUE TO MULTIPLE DISLOCATIONS. DOI: (B)(6) 2024, DOR: (B)(6) 2025, AFFECTED SIDE: RIGHT HIP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 22494402 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 20, 2025Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPACTED CUP, NO ISSUE, OPENED APPROPRIATE LINER, COULD NOT IMPACT. NO BONE OR SOFT TISSUE INTERFERENCE. OPENED SECOND LINER STILL HAD TROUBLE IMPACTING SECOND LINER. DIDN'T SEEM TO HAVE ANY DAMAGE TO CUP. NO THREADS FROM DOME, NO SOFT TISSUE OR BONE BETWEEN LOCKING MECHANISM. TRIED MULTIPLE ANGLES. EVENTUALLY WAS ABLE TO SEAT SECOND LINER. LISTING CUP AND LINER. ONLY WASTED LINER. DOE: (B)(6) 2025, AFFECTED SIDE: LEFT HIP.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22299342 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 3, 2025Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT HIP SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE LINER BROKE DURING IMPLANTATION. IT WAS BROKEN WITH A BONE TAMP. THERE WAS NO SURGICAL DELAY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONSEQUENCE.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21293996 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page